The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cross-cultural perspectives on the rise of special education policy discourses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite efforts to precipitate education policy changes aligned with the tenets of inclusion, the Cypriot legislative and education policy landscape is characterized by ambiguity and fixation on special education imperatives that create barriers to fostering accessible and universally designed environments (Liasidou and Mavrou 2023).”
From Accessibility and universal design in higher education curricula: implications for inclusion/exclusion (2025) · cites this paper as Liasidou and Mavrou 2023
In the citing paper
“The uncritical merging of polarized perspectives on disability reflects and is concomitantly the result of a profoundly entrenched preoccupation with special education discourses of disability (Haug 2017), exacerbated by the contradictory and non-binding nature of national and Bologna Process policy documents around inclusion and diversity in HE (Liasidou and Mavrou 2023;Kashnir 2020).”
From Accessibility and universal design in higher education curricula: implications for inclusion/exclusion (2025) · cites this paper as Liasidou and Mavrou 2023
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- Alves, 2020, Enacting education policy reform in Portugal – the process of change and the role of teacher education for inclusion, Eur. J. Teach. Educ., 43, 64, 10.1080/02619768.2019.1693995 · DOI
- Armstrong, 2013, Collaboration, partnerships and alliances: perspectives on erasmus mundus MA/magistr in special educational needs, Int. J. Incl. Educ., 17, 364, 10.1080/13603116.2011.651823 · DOI
- Armstrong, 2017, Neurodiversity: the future of special education?, Educ. Leader, 74, 10
- Armstrong, 2011, Inclusion: by choice or by chance?, Int. J. Incl. Educ., 15, 29, 10.1080/13603116.2010.496192 · DOI
- Artiles, 2020, Inclusive education in the 21st century disruptive interventions, Educ. Forum, 84, 289, 10.1080/00131725.2020.1831821 · DOI · Paper page
- Ball, 1993, What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes, Discourse, 13, 10
- Ball, 2013, Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities, Crit. Stud. Educ., 54, 85, 10.1080/17508487.2013.740678 · DOI
- 2007, vol. 4
- Degener, 2016, Disability in a human rights context, Laws, 5, 35, 10.3390/laws5030035 · DOI · Paper page
- Done, 2020, How inclusion became exclusion: policy, teachers and inclusive education, J. Educ. Pol., 35, 447
- Dudley-Marling, 2012, The effects of market-based school reforms on students with disabilities, Disabil. Stud. Q., 32, 10.18061/dsq.v32i2.3187 · DOI
- Fairclough, 2000, Language and neo-liberalism, Discourse Soc., 11, 147, 10.1177/0957926500011002001 · DOI
- Florian, 2019, On the necessary co-existence of special and inclusive education, Int. J. Incl. Educ., 23, 691, 10.1080/13603116.2019.1622801 · DOI
- Gildersleeve, 2012, Producing (im) possible peoples: policy discourse analysis, in-state resident tuition, and undocumented students in American higher education, Int. J. Multicult. Educ., 14, 10.18251/ijme.v14i2.517 · DOI
- Goodley, 2014, Posthuman disability studies, Subjectivity, 7, 342, 10.1057/sub.2014.15 · DOI
- Hursh, 2011, Contesting global neoliberalism and creating alternative futures, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32, 171
- Kayess, 2008, Out of darkness into light? Introducing the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, Hum. Right Law Rev., 8, 1, 10.1093/hrlr/ngm044 · DOI · Paper page
- Kozleski, 2020, Disrupting what passes as inclusive education: predicating educational equity on schools designed for all, Educ. Forum, 84, 340, 10.1080/00131725.2020.1801047 · DOI
- Lester, 2017, Exploring the intersection of education policy and discourse analysis: an introduction, Educ. Pol. Anal. Arch., 25
- Liasidou, 2008, Critical discourse analysis and inclusive educational policymaking: the power to exclude, J. Educ. Pol., 23, 483
- Liasidou, 2008, Politics of inclusive education policy-making: the case of Cyprus 4784 (excluding references), Int. J. Incl. Educ., 12, 229, 10.1080/13603110600996921 · DOI
- Liasidou, 2016, Disabling discourses and human rights law: a case study based on the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37, 149
- Liasidou, 2013, A special teacher for a special child?(Re) considering the role of the special education teacher within the context of an inclusive education reform agenda, Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ., 28, 494, 10.1080/08856257.2013.820484 · DOI
- Liasidou, 2019, Disabling discourses and some implications for parent leadership in special education policy and practice, Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ., 34, 342, 10.1080/08856257.2018.1520492 · DOI
- Liasidou, 2018, Neoliberal versus social justice reforms in education policy and practice: discourses, politics and disability rights in education, Crit. Stud. Educ., 59, 149, 10.1080/17508487.2016.1186102 · DOI
- Lindsay, 2020, Warnock 40 Years On: the development of special educational needs since the Warnock report and implications for the future, Front. Edu., 4, 164, 10.3389/feduc.2019.00164 · DOI
- Luke, 2002, Beyond science and ideology critique: developments in critical discourse analysis, Annu. Rev. Appl. Ling., 22, 96, 10.1017/S0267190502000053 · DOI
- Macklem, 2008, Minority rights in international law, Int. J. Consititut. Law, 6, 531, 10.1093/icon/mon019 · DOI
- Marshall, 2002, Confounded policies. Implementing site-based management and special education policy reforms, Educ. Pol., 16, 351, 10.1177/08904802016003001 · DOI
- McIntosh, 2011, Evaluation of social and academic effects of school-wide positive behaviour support in a Canadian school district, Except. Educ. Int., 21, 46
- Namey, 2008, Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets, Handbook for Team-based Qualitative Research, 2, 137
- Norwich, 2002, Education, inclusion and individual diff erences: recognizing and resolving dilemmas, Br. Educ. Res. J., 50, 482
- Norwich, 2019, From the Warnock Report (1978) to an Education Framework Commission: a novel contemporary approach to educational policy making for pupils with special educational needs/disabilities, Front. Edu., 4, 72, 10.3389/feduc.2019.00072 · DOI
- Reisigl, 2016, The discourse-historical approach (DHA), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3, 23
- Scott, 2001, A schoolwide example of positive behavioral support, J. Posit. Behav. Interv., 3, 88, 10.1177/109830070100300205 · DOI
- Simonsen, 2008, Schoolwide positive behavior supports: primary systems and practices, Teach. Except. Child., 40, 32, 10.1177/004005990804000604 · DOI
- Slee, 1999, The cultural politics of disability, education and the law, Discourse, 20, 267
- Symeonidou, 2009, Trapped in our past: the price we have to pay for our cultural disability inheritance, Int. J. Incl. Educ., 13, 565, 10.1080/13603110801972069 · DOI
- Symeonidou, 2017, Teacher education for inclusion: a review of the literature, Disabil. Soc., 32, 401, 10.1080/09687599.2017.1298992 · DOI
- Symeonidou, 2019, Problematizing disabling discourses around assessment and placement: can interdependence inform an alternative narrative?, Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ., 35, 70, 10.1080/08856257.2019.1607661 · DOI
- Taylor, 2004, Researching educational policy and change in ‘new times’: using critical discourse analysis, J. Educ. Pol., 19, 433
- Tomlinson, 2012, The irresistible rise of the SEN industry, Oxf. Rev. Educ., 38, 267, 10.1080/03054985.2012.692055 · DOI
- Bacchi, 2000, Policy as discourse: what does it mean? Where does it get us?, Discourse, 21, 45
- Danforth, 2015, Social justice and technocracy: tracing the narratives of inclusive education in the USA, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37, 582
- Liasidou, 2011, Unequal power relations and inclusive education policy making: a discursive analytic approach, Educ. Pol., 25, 887, 10.1177/0895904810386587 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mavrou, K., Theodorou, E., Mouka, M., & Liasidou, A. (2025) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2025.2507244 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liasidou, A., & Mavrou, K.
- Affiliations
- St Mary's University Twickenham London (GB)
- European University Cyprus (CY)
- Venue
- International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition)
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 259-268
- OpenAlex
- W4309301933
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- St Mary's University Repository (St Mary's University Twickenham London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
- Keywords
- special education, inclusive education, deficit discourse, education policy debate, policy reform, euphemism, ideology in education policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-cultural perspectives on the rise of special education policy discourses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.12002-0
- The paper
- Liasidou, A., & Mavrou, K. (2023). Cross-cultural perspectives on the rise of special education policy discourses. International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.12002-0