Cited by 646Law, Economics, and Judicial SystemsCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesEconomic Theory and Institutions

Property Rights and Economic Development*

Open access
Besley, Timothy, Ghatak, Maitreesh·2010·Handbook of Development Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-52944-2.00006-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Better access to information on land ownership will affect credit supply only if other impediments are absent, i.e., if agents have been credit constrained before and are endowed with sufficient levels of illiquid wealth that can be foreclosed upon at reasonable cost.

    “better access to information on land ownership will affect credit supply only if other impediments are absent, i.e., if agents have been credit constrained before and are endowed with sufficient levels of illiquid wealth that can be foreclosed upon at reasonable cost (Besley and Ghatak 2010).”
  • Establishment and maintenance of a property rights system is a public good that affects economic outcomes through reduction of expropriation risk and facilitation of market transactions.

    “Establishment and maintenance of a property rights system is a public good that affects economic outcomes through two main channels (Besley and Ghatak 2010). The first is the reduction of expropriation risk that will reduce the need to spend private resources on protecting property and increase investment incentives. The second is the facilitation of market transactions”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Besley, T., & Ghatak, M.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Venue
Handbook of Development Economics
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2010
Volume
5
Pages
4525-4595
ISSN
1573-4471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1893548940
Cited by
646
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 29
FWCI
95.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Handbook of development economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/D002761/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
property rights, economic development, institutional quality, land tenure, intellectual property

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review