Cited by 408Urban and Rural Development ChallengesLand Rights and ReformsHousing Market and Economics

Property rights and investment in urban slums

Open access
Field, Erica·2005·Journal of the European Economic Association

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of changes in tenure security on residential investment in urban squatter neighborhoods. To address the endogeneity of property rights, I make use of variation in ownership status induced by a nation-wide titling program in Peru. In a difference-in-difference analysis, I compare the change in housing investment before and after the program among participating households to the change in investment among two samples of non-participants. My results indicate that strengthening property rights in urban slums has a significant effect on residential investment: the rate of housing renovation rises by more than two-thirds of the baseline level. The bulk of the increase is financed without the use of credit, indicating that changes over time reflect an increase in investment incentives related to lower threat of eviction. (JEL: O12, O18, P25, P26) 1

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.279

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of sole land titling interventions suggest that tenure security results in significant improvements on residential investment in housing, hours of employment and reduction in the household demand for child labour.

    “However, studies of sole land titling interventions suggest that tenure security results in significant improvements on residential investment in housing (Field 2005), hours of employment (Field 2007) and reduction in the household demand for child labour (De Moura 2009; Field 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 16 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Field, E.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Field, Erica
Venue
Journal of the European Economic Association
Published
2005-05-01
Volume
3
Issue
2-3
Pages
279-290
ISSN
  • 1542-4766 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-4774
OpenAlex
W2129666746
Cited by
408
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
80.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the European Economic Association (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
Keywords
property rights, tenure security, urban slums, housing investment, housing renovation, land titling, eviction threats, informal settlements, Peru

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review