Cited by 64Hearing Impairment and CommunicationSpeech and Audio ProcessingHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

LIPS, TEETH, AND THE BENEFITS OF LIPREADING

Summerfield, Quentin, MacLeod, Alison, McGrath, Matthew, Brooke, Michael·1989·Handbook of Research on Face Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-87143-5.50019-6

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The McGurk effect occurs with both elaborate and schematic synthetic visual stimuli.

    “The effect occurs with the use of both elaborate and schematic synthetic visual stimuli”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Summerfield, Macleod, McGrath, & Brooke, 1989

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Summerfield, Q., MacLeod, A., McGrath, M., & Brooke, M.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Handbook of Research on Face Processing
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1989
Pages
223-233
OpenAlex
W2481376636
Cited by
64
References
20
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.31
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
lip reading, lip movement, speech perception, hearing loss, speech perception in noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review