Cited by 93Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Neuroticism from the Top Down: Psychophysiology and Negative Emotionality

Matthews, G.·2004·On the Psychobiology of Personality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-008044209-9/50015-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matthews, G.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Matthews, G.
Venue
On the Psychobiology of Personality
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2004
Pages
249-266
OpenAlex
W2501076325
Cited by
93
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.45
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
neuroticism, top-down control, psychophysiology, negative affectivity, emotion regulation, emotional reactivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review