The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Web Experiment Method
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
GPOWER: A general power analysis program
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03203630 · Cited by 4,864
Orne, M. T. (1962) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0043424 · Cited by 4,041
Parsons, H. M. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.183.4128.922 · Cited by 615
External validity of "trivial" experiments: The case of laboratory aggression.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (1997) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037//1089-2680.1.1.19 · Cited by 508
The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat
Rosenthal, R., & Fode, K. L. (2007) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830080302 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.93 · Cited by 2,932
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-2699 · Cited by 2,593
Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11
Silver, R. C. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.10.1235 · Cited by 1,244
Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7 · Cited by 950
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Web Experiment Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/b978-012099980-4/50005-8
- The paper
- Reips, U.-D. (2000). The Web Experiment Method. Psychological Experiments on the Internet. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012099980-4/50005-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
