The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Academic Self-Concept
Abstract
Publisher Summary Self-concept enhancement activities are included as a component of the school curriculum in some school districts. Also, teachers are sometimes called on to make judgments about the self-concepts of their students as part of the normal classroom assessment and school reporting practices. The importance placed on the enhancement of self-concept is usually based on the premise that high self-concept will lead to feelings of self-worth and self-acceptance. The research summarized in this chapter suggests that the attainment of a positive academic self-concept affects academic behavior, academic choices, educational aspirations, and subsequent academic achievement. The purpose of the chapter is to summarize research on the structure, assessment, measurement, and enhancement of academic self-concept in educational settings. It provides an overview of the theoretical structure of self-concept and the nature of valid and reliable self-concept measurement instruments. It also discusses the relationship of self-concept to other constructs and self-concept enhancement interventions. This discussion focuses on a model of self-concept originally developed by Richard Shavelson and his colleagues and subsequently revised by Marsh in collaboration with Shavelson and other colleagues. Throughout the chapter, the classroom implications of recent advances in self-concept theory and research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890
Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543046003407 · Cited by 4,164
Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis.
Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93 · Cited by 781
Timing of feedback and verbal learning.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058001079 · Cited by 703
Changing teacher and student behavior: An empirical investigation.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036499 · Cited by 140
Cited by
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510902751010 · Cited by 1,245
Self-citationMarsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x · Cited by 1,198
Self-citationAcademic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students' everyday academic resilience
Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002 · Cited by 833
Self-citationMarsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.5.364 · Cited by 717
Self-citationMarsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0604_1 · Cited by 593
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R.
- Venue
- Handbook of Classroom Assessment
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1996
- Pages
- 131-198
- OpenAlex
- W2766617775
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Academic Self-Concept. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/b978-012554155-8/50008-9
- The paper
- Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (1996). Academic Self-Concept. Handbook of Classroom Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012554155-8/50008-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.