CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 228Species Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 175 of the 180 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Vision for Global Biodiversity Monitoring With Citizen Science

Michael J. O. Pocock, Mark Chandler, Rick E. Bonney, Ian Thornhill, Anna Albin, Tom August, Steven P. Bachman, PETER M. J. BROWN, Daví Gasparini Fernandes Cunha, Audrey A. Grez, Colin H. W. Jackson, Monica Peters, Narindra Romer Rabarijaon, Helen Elizabeth Roy, Tania Zaviezo, Finn Danielsen·2018·Advances in Ecological Research
DOI 10.1016/bs.aecr.2018.06.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.aecr.2018.06.003

Cites

175 of 175 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 180 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cromarty, 2012, Translocation statistics (2002−2010), and the revised Department of Conservation translocation process, Notornis, 60, 55, 10.63172//723641dyvhgt · DOI
  2. McGeoch, 2015, An essential biodiversity variable approach to monitoring biological invasions: guide for countries, vol. 2
  3. Toomey, 2013, Can citizen science lead to positive conservation attitudes and behaviors?, Hum. Ecol. Rev., 20, 50

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–228 of 228

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pocock, M. J. O., Chandler, M., Bonney, R. E., Thornhill, I., Albin, A., August, T., Bachman, S. P., BROWN, P. M. J., Cunha, D. G. F., Grez, A. A., Jackson, C. H. W., Peters, M., Rabarijaon, N. R., Roy, H. E., Zaviezo, T., & Danielsen, F.
Affiliations
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • Earthwatch Institute (US)
  • Cornell Lab of Ornithology (US)
  • Earthwatch Europe (GB)
  • Nordisk Fond for Miljø og Udvikling (DK)
  • Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB)
  • Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of Chile (CL)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
Corresponding author
Michael J. O. Pocock
ORCID
Venue
Advances in Ecological Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2018
Pages
169-223
ISSN
0065-2504 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/bs.aecr.2018.06.003
OpenAlex
W2895127238
Cited by
228
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1
FWCI
15.86
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Advances in ecological research/Advances in Ecological Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research Space (acceptedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (submittedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/R016429/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
citizen science, biodiversity monitoring, participatory monitoring, Sustainable Development Goals, Aichi Biodiversity Targets, participant motivation, monitoring technology, Asia and Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review