Cited by 2,017Avian ecology and behaviorSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeResearch Data Management Practices

eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences

Sullivan, Brian L., Wood, Christopher L., Iliff, Marshall J., Bonney, Rick E., Fink, Daniel, Kelling, Steve·2009·Biological Conservation

Abstract

New technologies are rapidly changing the way we collect, archive, analyze, and share scientific data. For example, over the next several years it is estimated that more than one billion autonomous sensors will be deployed over large spatial and temporal scales, and will gather vast quantities of data. Networks of human observers play a major role in gathering scientific data, and whether in astronomy, meteorology, or observations of nature, they continue to contribute significantly. In this paper we present an innovative use of the Internet and information technologies that better enhances the opportunity for citizens to contribute their observations to science and the conservation of bird populations. eBird is building a web-enabled community of bird watchers who collect, manage, and store their observations in a globally accessible unified database. Through its development as a tool that addresses the needs of the birding community, eBird sustains and grows participation. Birders, scientists, and conservationists are using eBird data worldwide to better understand avian biological patterns and the environmental and anthropogenic factors that influence them. Developing and shaping this network over time, eBird has created a near real-time avian data resource producing millions of observations per year.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.006

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Citizen science can enable dataset collection at a scale impossible in individual studies.

    “Citizen science can also enable dataset collection at a scale impossible in individual studies [93,533,634,767].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [767]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sullivan, B. L., Wood, C. L., Iliff, M. J., Bonney, R. E., Fink, D., & Kelling, S.
Affiliations
Cornell Lab of Ornithology (US)
Corresponding author
Sullivan, Brian L.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
142
Issue
10
Pages
2282-2292
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085154695
Cited by
2,017
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 168 · 2025: 208 · 2024: 185 · 2023: 199 · 2022: 175 · 2021: 198 · 2020: 164 · 2019: 152 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 38
FWCI
23.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cornell Lab of Ornithology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
eBird, citizen science, bird observations, birdwatchers, online data collection, biodiversity data sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review