The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phage Lysis: Multiple Genes for Multiple Barriers
Open accessAbstract
The first steps in phage lysis involve a temporally controlled permeabilization of the cytoplasmic membrane followed by enzymatic degradation of the peptidoglycan. For Caudovirales of Gram-negative hosts, there are two different systems: the holin-endolysin and pinholin-SAR endolysin pathways. In the former, lysis is initiated when the holin forms micron-scale holes in the inner membrane, releasing active endolysin into the periplasm to degrade the peptidoglycan. In the latter, lysis begins when the pinholin causes depolarization of the membrane, which activates the secreted SAR endolysin. Historically, the disruption of the first two barriers of the cell envelope was thought to be necessary and sufficient for lysis of Gram-negative hosts. However, recently a third functional class of lysis proteins, the spanins, has been shown to be required for outer membrane disruption. Spanins are so named because they form a protein bridge that connects both membranes. Most phages produce a two-component spanin complex, composed of an outer membrane lipoprotein (o-spanin) and an inner membrane protein (i-spanin) with a predominantly coiled-coil periplasmic domain. Some phages have a different type of spanin which spans the periplasm as a single molecule, by virtue of an N-terminal lipoprotein signal and a C-terminal transmembrane domain. Evidence is reviewed supporting a model in which the spanins function by fusing the inner membrane and outer membrane. Moreover, it is proposed that spanin function is inhibited by the meshwork of the peptidoglycan, thus coupling the spanin step to the first two steps mediated by the holin and endolysin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Suttle, C. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04160 · Cited by 2,176
Watson, J. D. (1970) · Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · Cited by 2,062
Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments
Rost, B. (1999) · Protein Engineering, Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · Cited by 1,833
Growth of the Stress-Bearing and Shape-Maintaining Murein Sacculus of Escherichia coli
Höltje, J.-V. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.1.181-203.1998 · Cited by 1,129
An Introduction to Sequence Similarity (“Homology”) Searching
Pearson, W. R. (2013) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi0301s42 · Cited by 937
Saier, M. H. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj001 · Cited by 858
Holins: The Protein Clocks of Bacteriophage Infections
Wang, I.-N., Smith, D. L., & Young, R. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.799 · Cited by 806
Self-citationBacteriophage lysis: mechanism and regulation
Young, R. (1992) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.56.3.430-481.1992 · Cited by 773
Self-citationMechanisms of membrane fusion: disparate players and common principles
Martens, S., & McMahon, H. T. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2417 · Cited by 710
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli MscS, a Voltage-Modulated and Mechanosensitive Channel
Bass, R. B., Strop, P., Barclay, M., & Rees, D. C. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077945 · Cited by 590
Cited by
Gray, T., Storz, G., & Papenfort, K. (2022) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00341-21 · Cited by 71
Brawley, H. N., Kreinbrink, A. C., Hierholzer, J. D., Vali, S. W., & Lindahl, P. A. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c06625 · Cited by 30
Brawley, H. N., & Lindahl, P. A. (2021) · JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00775-021-01864-w · Cited by 22
Metaproteomics in the One Health framework for unraveling microbial effectors in microbiomes
Heyer, R., Wolf, M., Benndorf, D., Uzzau, S., Seifert, J., Grenga, L., Pabst, M., Schmitt, H., Mesuere, B., Van Den Bossche, T., et al. (2025) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-025-02119-5 · Cited by 22
Multicopy suppressor screens reveal convergent evolution of single-gene lysis proteins
Adler, B. A., Chamakura, K., Carion, H., Krog, J., Deutschbauer, A. M., Young, R., Mutalik, V. K., & Arkin, A. P. (2023) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-023-01269-7 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cahill, J., & Young, R.
- Venue
- Advances in Virus Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 103
- Pages
- 33-70
- ISSN
- 0065-3527 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903176883
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 49.18
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phage Lysis: Multiple Genes for Multiple Barriers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.09.003
- The paper
- Cahill, J., & Young, R. (2019). Phage Lysis: Multiple Genes for Multiple Barriers. Advances in Virus Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.09.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.