Cited by 11Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Limited evidence for probability matching as a strategy in probability learning tasks

Jessica L. Montag·2021·Psychology of Learning and Motivation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.plm.2021.02.005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work has questioned how often probability matching happens in probability learning tasks.

    “Recent work has questioned how often probability matching happens in probability learning tasks, where participants learn probabilities over numerous trials(Montag, 2021;Saldana et al., 2022).”

    From Probability matching and statistical naïveté (2025) · cites this paper as Montag, 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montag, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Jessica L. Montag
Venue
Psychology of Learning and Motivation
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2021
Pages
233-273
ISSN
0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3147503656
Cited by
11
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
13.06
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  • National Science Foundation (1123788)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD047425, T32 HD049899)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
probability matching, probability learning, probability maximization, children versus adults, reinforcement learning, language learning, cognitive development, behavioral variability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review