The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum Limits in Optical Interferometry
Open accessAbstract
Non-classical states of light find applications in enhancing the performance of optical interferometric experiments, with notable example of gravitational wave-detectors. Still, the presence of decoherence hinders significantly the performance of quantum-enhanced protocols. In this review, we summarize the developments of quantum metrology with particular focus on optical interferometry and derive fundamental bounds on achievable quantum-enhanced precision in optical interferometry taking into account the most relevant decoherence processes including: phase diffusion, losses and imperfect interferometric visibility. We introduce all the necessary tools of quantum optics as well as quantum estimation theory required to derive the bounds. We also discuss the practical attainability of the bounds derived and stress in particular that the techniques of quantum-enhanced interferometry which are being implemented in modern gravitational wave detectors are close to the optimal ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory
Sengijpta, S. K. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10484391 · Cited by 11,076
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
On the Quantum Correction For Thermodynamic Equilibrium
Wigner, E. (1932) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.40.749 · Cited by 9,283
Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics
Mandel, L., & Wolf, E. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644105 · Cited by 8,356
Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: Estimation theory
Prasad, K. V. (1994) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/0967-0661(94)90195-3 · Cited by 7,902
Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field
Glauber, R. J. (1963) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.131.2766 · Cited by 6,797
The Principles of Quantum Mechanics
Dirac, P. A. M., & Polkinghorne, J. C. (1958) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3062610 · Cited by 5,409
Ziegel, E. R., Lehmann, E. L., & Casella, G. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270597 · Cited by 4,203
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894
Quantum detection and estimation theory
Helstrom, C. W. (1969) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01007479 · Cited by 3,776
Cited by
Quantum Fisher information matrix and multiparameter estimation
Liu, J., Yuan, H., Lu, X.-M., & Wang, X. (2020) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab5d4d · Cited by 802
Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers
Schnabel, R. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.04.001 · Cited by 513
Quantum-enhanced measurements without entanglement
Braun, D., Adesso, G., Benatti, F., Floreanini, R., Marzolino, U., Mitchell, M. W., & Pirandola, S. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035006 · Cited by 434
Multiparameter Estimation in Networked Quantum Sensors
Proctor, T. J., Knott, P. A., & Dunningham, J. A. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.080501 · Cited by 318
Compatibility in multiparameter quantum metrology
Ragy, S., Jarzyna, M., & Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052108 · Cited by 305
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Jarzyna, M., & Kołodyński, J.
- Venue
- Progress in Optics
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2015
- Pages
- 345-435
- ISSN
- 0079-6638 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2272790570
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 164
- FWCI
- 83.88
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum Limits in Optical Interferometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/bs.po.2015.02.003
- The paper
- Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Jarzyna, M., & Kołodyński, J. (2015). Quantum Limits in Optical Interferometry. Progress in Optics. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.po.2015.02.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
