The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Based on Cohen's (1988) guidelines for interpreting effect sizes (Hedges'g), an effect size smaller than 0.2 is considered negligible, 0.2-0.5 is small, 0.5-0.8 is moderate, and greater than 0.8 is large.”
From Concept mapping in STEM education: a meta-analysis of its impact on students' achievement (2004–2023) (2025) · cites this paper as Cohen's (1988)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–113 of 113
Song, Y., Li, D., Zhang, S., Jin, Z., Zhen, Y., Su, Y., Zhang, M., Lu, L., Xue, X., Luo, J., et al. (2022) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114861 · Cited by 31
Villarreal-Zegarra, D., Yllescas-Panta, T., Malaquias-Obregon, S., Dámaso-Román, A., & Mayo-Puchoc, N. (2024) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103023 · Cited by 29
Stress management for patients with heart disease: A pilot study
Turner, L., Linden, W., Wal, R. V. D., & Schamberger, W. (1995) · Heart & Lung · doi:10.1016/s0147-9563(05)80009-3 · Cited by 27
Effects of Mind–Body Exercises on Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
Wei, G.-X., Yang, L., Imm, K., Loprinzi, P. D., Smith, L., Zhang, X., & Yu, Q. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00819 · Cited by 25
Group treatment for complex dissociative disorders: a randomized clinical trial
Bækkelund, H., Ulvenes, P., Boon-Langelaan, S., & Arnevik, E. A. (2022) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-03970-8 · Cited by 24
Maunick, B., Skvarc, D., Olive, L., & Mikocka-Walus, A. (2023) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111366 · Cited by 21
Bendig, E., Bauereiß, N., Buntrock, C., Habibović, M., Ebert, D. D., & Baumeister, H. (2021) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100375 · Cited by 20
Rickardsson, J., Zetterqvist, V., Kemani, M. K., Holmström, L., Andersson, E., & Wicksell, R. K. (2019) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.08.009 · Cited by 19
Otero, I., Cuadrado, D., & Martínez, A. (2020) · Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones · doi:10.5093/jwop2020a17 · Cited by 16
Taibah University, C. O. B. A., & ALKHAWALDEH, A. M. (2022) · GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites · doi:10.30892/gtg.43303-897 · Cited by 14
Wang, X.-M., Wang, J.-L., Xu, S.-Y., & Xu, S.-J. (2025) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-025-00554-2 · Cited by 14
Hunter, H., de Gracia Hahn, D., Duret, A., Im, Y. R., Cheah, Q., Dong, J., Fairey, M., Hjalmarsson, C., Li, A., Lim, H. K., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.56573 · Cited by 12
Efficacité d'un programme de traitement pour enfants abusés sexuellement
Tourigny, M., Péladeau, N., Doyon, M., & Bouchard, C. (1998) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/s0145-2134(97)00117-8 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Venue
- Elsevier eBooks
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1977
- OpenAlex
- W4300869678
- Cited by
- 2,457
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 59
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- statistical power analysis, statistical power, sample size determination, effect size, hypothesis testing, behavioral science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review