Cited by 21Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and careOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on fatigue for patients with cancer and other chronic health conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Maunick, Bernadette, Skvarc, David, Olive, Lisa, Mikocka-Walus, Antonina·2023·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective Fatigue is significantly more prevalent in the chronically ill compared to healthy individuals. Fatigue is one of the most reported and debilitating symptoms in individuals with chronic health conditions. Despite this, there is limited evidence examining the efficacy of psychological interventions to reduce fatigue, with the majority having focused on Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. As Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has shown to be efficacious in improving other outcomes for people with chronic health conditions, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of ACT in reducing fatigue for this population.Methods A systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trial Register and reference lists of relevant papers was conducted to obtain relevant studies. Inclusion criteria specified the study needed to be a randomised controlled trial which implemented an ACT predominant intervention and measured fatigue in adults with a chronic health condition. Data was pooled using the inverse-variance random effects model, with restricted maximum likelihood estimation, providing the standardized mean difference between control and experimental groups post intervention.Results The current systematic review and meta-analysis included eight RCTs. Participants with a chronic condition (including cancer and fibromyalgia) who received ACT interventions, displayed reduced levels of fatigue, indicative of a small effect (SMD = -0.16, 95% CI [-0.30, -0.01], p = 0.03).Conclusion While the evidence is limited to cancer and fibromyalgia, ACT shows promise in reducing fatigue. Future research should examine ACT for fatigue in other chronic health condition populations to broaden the scope of these findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111366

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maunick, B., Skvarc, D., Olive, L., & Mikocka-Walus, A.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Maunick, Bernadette
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
171
Pages
111366
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376648632
Cited by
21
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, fatigue, cancer, fibromyalgia, chronic disease, psychological intervention, symptom relief
MeSH terms
Adult, Fatigue, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Neoplasms, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review