Cited by 25Schizophrenia research and treatmentDiversity and Impact of DancePhysical Activity and Health

Effects of Mind–Body Exercises on Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Open access
Wei, Gao-Xia, Yang, Lin, Imm, Kellie, Loprinzi, Paul D., Smith, Lee, Zhang, Xiangyang, Yu, Qian·2020·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Mind-body exercises (MBEs) have been widely accepted as a complementary therapy for the patients with low exercise tolerance. Currently, the number of experimental studies investigating the effect of MBEs for improving symptoms in people with schizophrenia is increasing. However, results are inconsistent. Methods: We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the effects of mind-body exercises on schizophrenia. Seven electronic databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], CNKI and Wangfang) were screened through October 2019 and risk of bias of included studies were assessed in Review Manager 5.3. Results: Meta-analysis on 13 studies with 1159 patients showed moderately significant effects in favor of mind-body exercise intervention to improve positive symptoms (SMD = 0.31; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.60; p = 0.04), negative symptoms (SMD = 0.37; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.60; p = 0.002) and depression (SMD = 0.88; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.13; p<0.00001). Meta-regression analysis revealed that the improvement in positive symptoms was positively associated with the frequency of intervention (p = 0.04) while a marginally significant correlation was observed between the improved negative symptoms and duration of each session (p = 0.06). Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports the therapeutic effects of MBEs to aid in the treatment of schizophrenia. Further studies need to incorporate rigorous design and large sample size to identify the optimal type and dose of mind-body exercise to inform clinical practices on MBEs recommendations for the management of schizophrenia symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00819

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Higgins GJ Gorczynski P Faulkner G Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Version 5.1.0. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2011) 5: Cd004412. 10.1002/14651858.CD004412.pub2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, G.-X., Yang, L., Imm, K., Loprinzi, P. D., Smith, L., Zhang, X., & Yu, Q.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
  • Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yu, Qian
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2020-08-13
Volume
11
Pages
819-819
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3049303731
Cited by
25
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31671163, 31871115)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y9CX402008, 31671163)
  • Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y9CX402008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Diversity and Impact of Dance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
mind-body exercise, schizophrenia, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depression, complementary therapy, exercise frequency, session duration, intervention dosage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review