Cited by 446Traffic and Road SafetyOlder Adults Driving StudiesHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

The observed effects of teenage passengers on the risky driving behavior of teenage drivers

Simons-Morton, Bruce, Lerner, Neil, Singer, Jeremiah·2005·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

The association between teenage passengers and crash risks among young drivers may be due to risky driving behavior. We investigated the effect on two measures of risky driving in the presence of young male and female passengers. Vehicles exiting from parking lots at 10 high schools were observed and the occupants were identified by gender and age (teen or adult). At a nearby site, the speed and headway of passing traffic were recorded using video and LIDAR technology. Teenage drivers drove faster than the general traffic and allowed shorter headways, particularly in the presence of a male teenage passenger. Both male and female teenage drivers allowed shorter headways (relative to no passenger or a female passenger) in the presence of a male teenage passenger, while the presence of a female teenage passenger resulted in longer headways for male teenage drivers. Overall, the observed rate of high risk driving (defined as speed > or =15 mph or more above the posted speed limit and/or headway of < or =1.0 s) for the teen male driver/male passenger condition was about double that of general traffic. In conclusion, the presence of male teenage passengers was associated with risky driving behavior among teenage drivers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescent risk taking is much more likely than that of adults to occur in the presence of peers.

    “One of the hallmarks of adolescent risk taking is that it is much more likely than that of adults to occur in the presence of peers, as evidenced in studies of reckless driving (Simons-Morton, Lerner & Singer, 2005), substance abuse (Chassin, Hussong & Beltran, 2009), and crime (Zimring, 1998).”

    From Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry (2011) · cites this paper as Simons-Morton, Lerner & Singer, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simons-Morton, B., Lerner, N., & Singer, J.
Affiliations
Westat (United States) (US)
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
973-982
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098772869
Cited by
446
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 25
FWCI
77.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
teenage drivers, risky driving behavior, speed, headway, gender differences, young male drivers
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Attitude to Health, Automobile Driving, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Risk Factors, Risk-Taking, Safety, Social Support, Students, United States, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review