Cited by 51Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related FatigueTraffic and Road Safety

Estimated cost of crashes in commercial drivers supports screening and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

Open access
Gurubhagavatula, Indira, Nkwuo, Jonathan E., Maislin, Greg, Pack, Allan I.·2008·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

Sleep apnea among commercial drivers may increase the risk of fall-asleep crashes, which incur large expenses. Drivers of passenger cars whose apnea is treated experience lower crash risk. Among community-based holders of commercial driver's licenses, we considered three methods for identifying sleep apnea syndrome: (1) in-lab polysomnography; (2) selective in-lab polysomnography for high-risk drivers, where high risk is first identified by body mass index, age and gender, followed by oximetry in a subset of drivers; (3) not screening. The costs for each of these three programs equaled the sum of the costs of testing, treatment of identified cases, and crashes. Assuming that treatment prevents apnea-related crashes, polysomnography is not cost-effective, because it was more expensive than the cost of crashes when no screening is done. Screening with BMI, age and gender, however, with confirmatory in-lab polysomnography only on high-risk drivers was cost-effective, as long as a high proportion (73.8%) of screened drivers accepts treatment. These findings indicate that strategies that reduce reliance on in-laboratory polysomnography may be more cost-effective than not screening, and that treatment acceptance may need to be a condition of employment for affected drivers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.011

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Workplace programs to increase screening and treatment of sleep apnea may have financial benefits for companies.

    “Accordingly, workplace programs to increase screening and treatment of sleep apnea may have financial benefits for companies.184”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [184]

  • Sleep apnea impairs commercial drivers' ability to drive safely.

    “For example, sleep apnea occurs at high rates among commercial drivers184–186 and impairs their ability to drive safely.”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [184]

  • Sleep apnea occurs at high rates among commercial drivers.

    “For example, sleep apnea occurs at high rates among commercial drivers184–186 and impairs their ability to drive safely.”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [184]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [17]Maislin G, Gurubhagavatula I, Hachadoorian R, Pack F, O’Brien E, Bogage A, Staley B, Dinges D, Pack A. Operating Characteristics of the Multivariable Apnea Prediction Index in Non-Clinic Populations. Sleep. 2003;26(S):A247. [Google Scholar]
  2. [29]National Center for Statistics and Analysis. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2002. Traffic Safety Facts - Large Trucks. [Google Scholar]
  3. [39]FMCSA Annual Report. Share the Road Safely. Office of Research and Technology, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; Washington, D.C: 2001. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gurubhagavatula, I., Nkwuo, J. E., Maislin, G., & Pack, A. I.
Affiliations
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Gurubhagavatula, Indira
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
104-115
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160888874
Cited by
51
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Federal Highway Administration
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P50HL060287, P01-HL60287)
  • National Center for Research Resources (K23-RR16068-03, 3-M01-RR00040-39S2, M01RR000040, K23RR016068)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, commercial drivers, accident costs, sleep apnea screening, polysomnography, cost-effectiveness, body mass index, oximetry, treatment acceptance
MeSH terms
Accidents, Occupational, Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oximetry, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Transportation, Odds Ratio, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review