Cited by 197Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disorders

Randomised prospective parallel trial of therapeutic versus subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure on simulated steering performance in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

Open access
Hack, M.·2000·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) impairs vigilance and may lead to an increased rate of driving accidents. In uncontrolled studies accident rates and simulated steering performance improve following treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). This study seeks to confirm the improvement in steering performance in a randomised controlled trial using subtherapeutic NCPAP as a control treatment. METHODS: Fifty nine men with OSA (Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS) of > or =10, and > or =10/h dips in SaO(2) of >4% due to OSA) received therapeutic or subtherapeutic NCPAP ( approximately 1 cm H(2)O) for one month. Simulated steering performance over three 30-minute "drives" was quantified as: standard deviation (SD) of road position, deterioration in SD across the drive, length of drive before "crashing", and number of off-road events. The reaction times to peripheral target stimuli during the drive were also measured. RESULTS: Subtherapeutic NCPAP did not improve overnight >4% SaO(2) dips/h compared with baseline values, thus acting as a control. The SD of the steering position improved from 0.36 to 0.21 on therapeutic NCPAP, and from 0.35 to 0.30 on subtherapeutic NCPAP (p = 0.03). Deterioration in SD of the steering position improved from 0.18 to 0.06 SD/h with therapeutic NCPAP and worsened from 0.18 to 0.24 with subtherapeutic NCPAP (p = 0.04). The reaction time to target stimuli was quicker after therapeutic than after subtherapeutic NCPAP (2.3 versus 2.7 seconds, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic NCPAP improves steering performance and reaction time to target stimuli in patients with OSA, lending further support to the hypothesis that OSA impairs driving, increases driving accident rates, and that these improve following treatment with NCPAP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thorax.55.3.224

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [20]20. Jenkinson C, Davies RJO, Mullins R, et al. Randomised pro- spective parallel trial of therapeutic nasal continuous posi- tive airway pressure (NCPAP) against sub-therapeutic NCPAP for obstructive sleep apnoea. Lancet 1999;353: 2100-5.
  2. [34]34. Bonnet MH. Cognitive eVects of sleep and sleep fragmenta- tion. Sleep 1993;16:S65-7.
  3. [38]38. Chugh DK, Weaver TE, Dinges DF. Neurobehavioral con- sequences of arousals. Sleep 1996;19 :S198-201.
  4. [42]42. Feuerstein C, Naegele B, Pepin JL, et al. Deficits of cognitive executive functions in patients with sleep apnea syndrome Acta Neurol Belg 1997;97:96-107.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hack, M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Hack, M.
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
224-231
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046298535
Cited by
197
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, driving performance, driving simulation, steering performance, reaction time, sustained attention, sleepiness, traffic accidents, oxygen desaturation
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Aged, Automobile Driving, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Respiration, Artificial, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Sleep Wake Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review