Cited by 46Sleep and Work-Related FatigueHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetySleep and related disorders

Sleep and sleepiness during an ultra long-range flight operation between the Middle East and United States

Holmes, Alexandra, Al-Bayat, Soha, Hilditch, Cassie, Bourgeois-Bougrine, Samira·2012·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

This study provides a practical example of fatigue risk management in aviation. The sleep and sleepiness of 44 pilots (11 trips × 4 pilot crew) working an ultra long-range (ULR; flight time >16 h) round-trip operation between Doha and Houston was assessed. Sleep was assessed using activity monitors and self-reported sleep diaries. Mean Karolinska Sleepiness Scores (KSS) for climb and descent did not exceed 5 ("neither alert nor sleepy"). Mean daily sleep duration was maintained above 6.3h throughout the operation. During in-flight rest periods, 98% of pilots obtained sleep and sleepiness was subsequently reduced. On layover (49.5h) crew were advised to sleep on Doha or Universal Co-ordinated Time (UTC), but 64% slept during the local (social) night time. Pilots originating from regions with a siesta culture were more likely to nap and made particularly effective use of their daytime in-flight rest periods. The results indicate that the operation is well designed from a fatigue management perspective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.021

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep disorders screening in addition to circadian approaches and scheduled napping has shown effectiveness in improving safety.

    “To address these concerns, sleep disorders screening in addition to circadian approaches and scheduled napping have shown effectiveness in improving safety.189–197”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [193]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holmes, A., Al-Bayat, S., Hilditch, C., & Bourgeois-Bougrine, S.
Affiliations
Qatar Airways (Qatar) (QA)
Corresponding author
Holmes, Alexandra
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
45
Pages
27-31
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093490057
Cited by
46
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
pilot fatigue, sleep, sleepiness, fatigue risk management, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, napping, sleep duration
MeSH terms
Aerospace Medicine, Aviation, Circadian Rhythm, Fatigue, Humans, Middle East, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, United States, Work Schedule Tolerance, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review