Cited by 35Sleep and Work-Related FatigueHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetySleep and related disorders

Restricted sleep and negative affective states in commercial pilots during short haul operations

Open access
Drury, D. Arthur, Ferguson, Sally A., Thomas, Matthew J.W.·2012·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

This study aims to investigate (1) the relationship between restricted sleep and Heightened Emotional Activity (HEA) during normal flight operations, and (2) whether sleep patterns influence the strength of the HEA as a response to threats. Accident investigation reports continue to highlight the relationship between restricted sleep and poor safety outcomes. However, to date we have a limited understanding of how sleep and HEA interact. A total of 302 sectors of normal airline flight operations were observed by trained observers, and instances of heightened emotional activity were recorded. During the cruise phase of each of these sectors, crew members were asked to calculate the amount of sleep they had obtained in previous 24 and 48 h. In the 302 sectors of normal flight operations, 535 instances of HEA were observed. Descriptive analyses of instances of HEA and sleep in the prior 24 and 48 h showed a significant relationship between the occurrence of HEA and recent sleep. The relationship between restricted sleep and HEA suggests that there may well be further implications with respect to operational safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.031

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep disorders screening in addition to circadian approaches and scheduled napping has shown effectiveness in improving safety.

    “To address these concerns, sleep disorders screening in addition to circadian approaches and scheduled napping have shown effectiveness in improving safety.189–197”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [191]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drury, D. A., Ferguson, S. A., & Thomas, M. J. W.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Drury, D. Arthur
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
45
Pages
80-84
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017721259
Cited by
35
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep deprivation, commercial pilots, airline operations, short-haul flights, negative emotions, flight safety, sleep patterns
MeSH terms
Aerospace Medicine, Aviation, Emotions, Fatigue, Humans, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Wakefulness, Work Schedule Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review