Cited by 214Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesStatistical Methods and Applications

Utilities for quantifying separation in PCA/PLS-DA scores plots

Open access
Worley, Bradley, Halouska, Steven, Powers, Robert·2013·Analytical Biochemistry

Abstract

Metabolic fingerprinting studies rely on interpretations drawn from low-dimensional representations of spectral data generated by methods of multivariate analysis such as principal components analysis and projection to latent structures discriminant analysis. The growth of metabolic fingerprinting and chemometric analyses involving these low-dimensional scores plots necessitates the use of quantitative statistical measures to describe significant differences between experimental groups. Our updated version of the PCAtoTree software provides methods to reliably visualize and quantify separations in scores plots through dendrograms employing both nonparametric and parametric hypothesis testing to assess node significance, as well as scores plots identifying 95% confidence ellipsoids for all experimental groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ab.2012.10.011

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are many supervised methods, with partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) or its variants being the most commonly used for comparing two groups.

    “There are a large number of supervised methods (120, 127), with the most commonly used analysis for comparing 2 groups being partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) (132) or one of its several variants.”

    From The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure (2014) · cites this paper as [127]

  • Multivariate analysis is most commonly used for explorative analysis of metabolic profiling data.

    “Multivariate analysis is most commonly used for explorative analysis of metabolic profiling data (127).”

    From The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure (2014) · cites this paper as [127]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Zhang B Powers R Using NMR-based metabolomics to study the regulation of biofilm formation Future Med. Chem 2012 4 1273 1306 22800371 PMC3564560
  2. [4]Retief JD Phylogenetic analysis using Methods Mol. Biol. (Totowa, N. J.) 2000 132 243 258 10547839
  3. [11]Koutroumbas K Theodoridis S Pattern Recognition 2006 Amsterdam, Boston Elsevier/Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Worley, B., Halouska, S., & Powers, R.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Powers, Robert
Venue
Analytical Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
433
Issue
2
Pages
102-104
ISSN
0003-2697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159118331
Cited by
214
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RO1 AI087668, R21 AI087561, RR015468-01)
  • NIH National Center for Research Resources (P20 RR-17675)
  • America Heart Association (0860033Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
metabolic fingerprinting, principal component analysis, PLS-DA, dendrogram, confidence ellipsoids, chemometrics software
MeSH terms
Models, Theoretical, Software, Metabolomics, Metabolome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review