Cited by 276Analytical chemistry methods developmentAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Application of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of three phthalate esters in water samples

Liang, Pei, Xu, Jing, Li, Qian·2008·Analytica Chimica Acta

Abstract

A novel method, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-variable wavelength detector (HPLC-VWD), has been developed for the determination of three phthalate esters (dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), and di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP)) in water samples. A mixture of extraction solvent (41 microL carbon tetrachloride) and dispersive solvent (0.75 mL acetonitrile) were rapidly injected into 5.0 mL aqueous sample for the formation of cloudy solution, the analytes in the sample were extracted into the fine droplets of CCl4. After extraction, phase separation was performed by centrifugation and the enriched analytes in the sedimented phase were determined by HPLC-VWD. Some important parameters, such as the kind and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, extraction time and salt effect were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum extraction condition, the method yields a linear calibration curve in the concentration range from 5 to 5000 ng mL(-1) for target analytes. The enrichment factors for DMP, DEP and DnBP were 45, 92 and 196, respectively, and the limits of detection were 1.8, 0.88 and 0.64 ng mL(-1), respectively. The relative standard deviations (R.S.D.) for the extraction of 10 ng mL(-1) of phthalate esters were in the range of 4.3-5.9% (n=7). Lake water, tap water and bottled mineral water samples were successfully analyzed using the proposed method.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aca.2007.12.025

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, P., Xu, J., & Li, Q.
Affiliations
Central China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liang, Pei
Venue
Analytica Chimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
609
Issue
1
Pages
53-58
ISSN
0003-2670 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089522280
Cited by
276
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
FWCI
26.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, phthalates, dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, water analysis, carbon tetrachloride extraction, preconcentration, lake water, tap water, bottled mineral water
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Esters, Osmolar Concentration, Phthalic Acids, Solvents, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review