Heterogeneity assessment of antibody-derived therapeutics at the intact and middle-up level by low-flow sheathless capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
Antibody-based pharmaceuticals often encompass a complex structural heterogeneity requiring enhanced analytical methods for reliable characterization of variants and degradation products. We have explored the capabilities of low-flow sheathless capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) for the high-resolution and sensitive profiling of antibody therapeutics. Near-zero electroosmotic flow was achieved by employing a novel neutral capillary coating that also prevents protein adsorption. CE-MS analysis of intact model proteins using an acidic background electrolyte demonstrated satisfactory performance, with overall migration-time RSDs below 2.2% from three different capillaries tested. For system evaluation, three nanobody preparations, including mono- and bivalent forms, and three monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were analyzed. Intact nanobodies were resolved from their degradation products, which could be assigned to deamidated, cleaved, and truncated forms at the C-terminal tag. Excellent resolution of isomeric deamidated products was obtained. The mAbs were analyzed intact and after digestion by the endoproteinase IdeS (middle-up approach). CE-MS of intact mAbs provided resolution of clipped species (e.g. light chain and light chain-heavy chain fragments) from the native protein. Moreover, glycoforms containing sialic acids were resolved from their non-sialylated counterparts. For IdeS-digested, F (ab)2 and Fc/2 portions where efficiently resolved for the three mAbs. Whereas the migration time of the Fc/2 fragments was fairly similar, the migration time of the F (ab)2 part was strongly varied among the mAbs. For all mAbs, separation of Fc/2 charge variants - including sialylated glycoforms and other post-translational modifications, such as loss of C-terminal lysine or asparagine deamidation - was achieved. This allowed a detailed and reliable assessment of the Fc/2 heterogeneity (18–33 proteoforms) of the three analyzed mAbs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A neutral capillary produced almost zero EOF for intact protein analysis.
“Haselberg et al. reported almost zero EOF with the use of a neutral capillary for the analysis of intact proteins105.”
From Recent trends of capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry in proteomics research (2019) · cites this paper as [105]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Haselberg, R., de Jong, G. J., & Somsen, G. W. (2013) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac303158f · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationBush, D. R., Zang, L., Belov, A. M., Ivanov, A. R., & Karger, B. L. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03218 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Jooß, K., Hühner, J., Kiessig, S., Moritz, B., & Neusüß, C. (2017) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0542-0 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Marie, A.-L., Dominguez-Vega, E., Saller, F., Plantier, J.-L., Urbain, R., Borgel, D., Tran, N. T., Somsen, G. W., & Taverna, M. (2016) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2016.10.016 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent trends of capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry in proteomics research
Gomes, F. P., & Yates, J. R. (2019) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21599 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haselberg, R., De Vijlder, T., Heukers, R., Smit, M. J., Romijn, E. P., Somsen, G. W., & Domínguez-Vega, E.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Somsen, Govert W.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Analytica Chimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 1044
- Pages
- 181-190
- ISSN
- 0003-2670 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887303524
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Analytica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
- Keywords
- therapeutic antibodies, protein heterogeneity, nanobodies, monoclonal antibodies, degradation products, deamidation, F(ab')2 fragments, charge variants, post-translational modification, protein adsorption
- MeSH terms
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments, Sialic Acids, Mass Spectrometry, Electrophoresis, Capillary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review