CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Library Science and Information LiteracyE-Learning and COVID-19Online and Blended Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adapting during the pandemic: A case study of using the rapid prototyping instructional system design model to create online instructional content

Dong, Hanwen·2021·The Journal of Academic Librarianship
DOI 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102356
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102356

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Boulet, 2009, Rapid prototyping: An efficient way to collaboratively design and develop e-learning content, Navy E-Learning Center of Excellence, 6
  2. Davis, 2013, Using instructional design principles to develop effective information literacy instruction: The ADDIE model, College & Research Libraries News, 74, 205, 10.5860/crln.74.4.8934 · DOI
  3. Easter, 2014, Faculty and librarians unite! How two librarians and one faculty member developed an information literacy strategy for distance education students, Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8, 242, 10.1080/1533290X.2014.945867 · DOI
  4. Koneru, 2010, ADDIE: Designing web-enabled information literacy instructional modules, DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology; Delhi, 30, 23, 10.14429/djlit.30.388 · DOI
  5. Meier, 2016, Turning the revolution into an evolution: The case for design thinking and rapid prototyping in libraries, College & Research Libraries News, 77, 283, 10.5860/crln.77.6.9506 · DOI
  6. Meier, 2018, Fail early and often to succeed: The case for rapid prototyping in libraries, Library Leadership & Management, 33, 1, 10.5860/llm.v33i1.7290 · DOI
  7. Mullins, 2014, Good IDEA: Instructional design model for integrating information literacy, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40, 339, 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.012 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mullins, 2016, IDEA model from theory to practice: Integrating information literacy in academic courses, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42, 55, 10.1016/j.acalib.2015.10.008 · DOI
  9. Nichols Hess, 2016, Designing for engagement: Using the ADDIE model to integrate high-impact practices into an online information literacy course, Communications in Information Literacy, 10, 264, 10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.27 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Reinbold, 2013, Using the ADDIE model in designing library instruction, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 32, 244, 10.1080/02763869.2013.806859 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Tripp, 1990, Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy, Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 31, 10.1007/BF02298246 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Dong, H.
Affiliations
University of Idaho (US)
Corresponding author
Dong, Hanwen
ORCID
Dong, Hanwen
Venue
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
102356
ISSN
0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102356
OpenAlex
W3148777300
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7
FWCI
18.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
instructional design, online instruction, COVID-19 pandemic, library instruction, information literacy instruction, first-year composition, transition from face-to-face to online learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review