Cited by 59Dental Health and Care UtilizationInnovations in Medical EducationInterprofessional Education and Collaboration

Educating pediatricians and family physicians in children's oral health

Douglass, Alan B., Douglass, Joanna M., Krol, David M.·2009·Academic Pediatrics

Abstract

Publication of Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General (SGROH) alerted the public and health professionals to the importance of oral health and the vulnerability of poor and underserved children to dental disease. In response, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), and the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) have initiated training programs for residents and practicing physicians, allowing them to conduct oral health screenings, apply preventive strategies, and facilitate appropriate referrals to dentists. Training programs are increasingly available on the Web, but their quality and effectiveness are rarely assessed. To ensure greater inclusion of oral health in graduate medical education, voluntary curricular guidelines have been developed, and education in oral health is mandated in family medicine residency programs. Several initiatives engaging practicing physicians in oral health activities have demonstrated improved access and reduced dental disease in children, but evaluation of all programs is essential to determine cost effectiveness and outcomes. The actions of AAP, AAFP, STFM, and other large-scale initiatives have helped break down the traditional separation between medicine and dentistry. Collaboration between physicians and dentists should be encouraged at all levels of education to ensure improvement of the oral health of America's children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acap.2009.09.004

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglass, A. B., Douglass, J. M., & Krol, D. M.
Affiliations
Middlesex Hospital (US)
Venue
Academic Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
452-456
ISSN
1876-2859 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045034207
Cited by
59
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Keywords
children's oral health, pediatrician training, family physician training, oral health screening, dental disease prevention, referral to dentist, graduate medical education, curriculum guidelines, disadvantaged children, dentist-physician collaboration, web-based training program, program evaluation
MeSH terms
Workforce, Child, Curriculum, Dental Caries, Education, Medical, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Oral Health, Pediatrics, Physicians, Family, United States, Dental Care for Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review