Cited by 117Child and Adolescent HealthInfant Development and Preterm CareDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Evidence-based milestones for surveillance of cognitive, language, and motor development

Open access
Sheldrick, R. Christopher, Perrin, Ellen C.·2013·Academic Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective Fewer than half of the nation's pediatricians conduct systematic surveillance of young children's development. Because time and cost are among the barriers, our objective was to create a brief set of parent-report questions about cognitive, motor, and language milestones that is freely available and can be administered and scored quickly.Methods A team of experts developed candidate items after reviewing existing instruments and prior research. We selected final items based on statistical fit to a graded item response model developed and replicated in separate samples enrolled from primary care settings (n = 469 and 308, respectively). We then developed a 10-item form for each visit on the pediatric periodicity schedule. Combining our initial samples with 395 families enrolled from referral clinics, we tested these forms' concurrent validity with respect to the ASQ-3 and parent reports of developmental diagnoses.Results A final set of 54 items displayed adequate fit to our statistical model regardless of race/ethnicity, education level, and child gender. Beginning at 4 months, scores on 10-item forms displayed consistent associations with the ASQ-3, and all but the 60-month form detected parents' reports of developmental delay with adequate sensitivity and specificity.Conclusions The Milestones is one element of the Survey of Well-being of Young Children (SWYC), a brief but comprehensive screening instrument for children under 5 years. The Milestones is a set of evidence-based items with individual normative data that are appropriate for pediatric surveillance. In addition, the scoring of 10-item Milestones forms may provide many advantages of a first level developmental screening instrument.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acap.2013.07.001

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variability across surveillance resources, including the CDC's, can create confusion regarding what constitutes a concern and when developmental screening between recommended ages might be warranted.

    “However, variability across surveillance resources, including the CDC’s, can create confusion regarding what constitutes a concern and when developmental screening between recommended ages might be warranted.3,4,38,76”

    From Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools (2022) · cites this paper as [38]

    The paper says CDC-recommended milestone checklists are used in surveillance and that an above-threshold Milestones score should prompt further investigation, potentially including a validated developmental screening instrument (Introduction and Discussion; page unavailable). It does not say that variability across surveillance resources creates confusion about what constitutes a concern or when screening between recommended ages is warranted. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheldrick, R. C., & Perrin, E. C.
Affiliations
Tufts Medical Center (US)
Venue
Academic Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
577-586
ISSN
1876-2859 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116435785
Cited by
117
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Commonwealth Fund
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (KM1CA156726)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (L40 HD077786)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
developmental milestones, child development monitoring, developmental screening, cognitive development, language development, motor development, ASQ-3, developmental delay, primary care, reference values
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Cognition, Humans, Language Development, Motor Skills, Pediatrics, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review