Cited by 59Adolescent and Pediatric HealthcareChild and Adolescent HealthPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Care coordination, the family-centered medical home, and functional disability among children with special health care needs

Litt, Jonathan S., McCormick, Marie C.·2015·Academic Pediatrics

Abstract

Background Children with special health care needs (CSHCN) are at increased risk for functional disabilities. Care coordination has been shown to decrease unmet health service use but has yet been shown to improve functional status. We hypothesize that care coordination services lower the odds of functional disability for CSHCN and that this effect is greater within the context of a family-centered medical home. A secondary objective was to test the mediating effect of unmet care needs on functional disability.Methods Our sample included children ages 0 to 17 years participating the 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. Care coordination, unmet needs, and disability were measured by parent report. We used logistic regression models with covariate adjustment for confounding and a mediation analysis approach for binary outcomes to assess the effect of unmet needs.Results There were 34,459 children in our sample. Care coordination was associated with lower odds of having a functional disability (adjusted odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.77, 0.88). This effect was greater for care coordination in the context of a medical home (adjusted odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.66, 0.76). The relationship between care coordination and functional disability was mediated by reducing unmet services.Conclusions Care coordination is associated with lower odds of functional disability among CSHCN, especially when delivered in the setting of a family-centered medical home. Reducing unmet service needs mediates this effect. Our findings support a central role for coordination services in improving outcomes for vulnerable children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acap.2014.08.006

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Litt, J. S., & McCormick, M. C.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Litt, Jonathan S.
Venue
Academic Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
185-190
ISSN
1876-2859 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111342278
Cited by
59
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (T76-MC-00001)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1 L40 HD070218-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
care coordination, functional disability, children with special health care needs, unmet care needs, mediation analysis, pediatric primary care, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Health Services, Child, Preschool, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Odds Ratio, Patient-Centered Care, Children with Disabilities, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review