The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus
Open accessAbstract
Executives see technology, data and analytics as a transforming force in business. Many organizations are therefore implementing business intelligence & analytics (BI&A) technologies to support reporting and decision-making. Traditionally, management accounting is the primary support for decision-making and control in an organization. As such, it has clear links to and can benefit from applying BI&A technologies. This indicates an interesting research area for accounting and AIS researchers. However, a review of the literature in top accounting and information systems journals indicates that to date, little research has focused on this link. This article reviews the literature, points to several research gaps and proposes a framework for studying the relationship between BI&A and management accounting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132319 · Cited by 7,449
(2011) · Cited by 7,157
Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005) · Cited by 6,637
Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact
Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703503 · Cited by 6,250
Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099 · Cited by 4,672
Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-6804 · Cited by 3,630
Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system.
Davenport, T. H. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 3,335
Chenhall, R. H. (2003) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(01)00027-7 · Cited by 3,237
Big other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization
Zuboff, S. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5 · Cited by 3,205
Metadata
- Authors
- Rikhardsson, P., & Yigitbasioglu, O.
- Venue
- International Journal of Accounting Information Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- 37-58
- ISSN
- 1467-0895 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2797543619
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 133
- FWCI
- 32.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.accinf.2018.03.001
- The paper
- Rikhardsson, P., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2018). Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2018.03.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
