The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes
Open accessAbstract
This study explored the diagnostic utility of the composite scores of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) and Post Concussion Symptom Scale scores (PCSS). Recently concussed high school athletes (N=72) were tested within 72 h of sustaining a concussion, and data were compared to non-concussed high school athletes with no history of concussion (N=66). Between-groups MANOVA revealed a significant multivariate effect of concussion on test performance (p<.001); univariate ANOVAS revealed all six measures contributed to the between-groups differences. A discriminant function analyses was conducted to measure the ability of the five ImPACT composite scores, as well as the PCSS to classify concussion status. One discriminant function was identified that consisted of the Visual Memory, Processing Speed, and Impulse Control composite scores PCSS, which correctly classified 85.5% of the cases. Approximately 82% of participants in the concussion group and 89% of participants in the control group were correctly classified. Using these data, the sensitivity of ImPACT was 81.9%, and the specificity was 89.4%. As part of a formal concussion management program, ImPACT is a useful tool for the assessment of the neurocognitive and neurobehavioral sequelae of concussion, and can also provide post-injury cognitive and symptom data that can assist a practitioner in making safer return to play decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Field, M., Collins, M. W., Lovell, M. R., & Maroon, J. (2003) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1067/mpd.2003.190 · Cited by 802
Self-citationNeurology (1997) · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.3.581 · Cited by 678
Validity of ImPACT for measuring processing speed following sports-related concussion
Iverson, G. L., Lovell, M. R., & Collins, M. W. (2005) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1081/13803390490918435 · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Cited by
Sport-Related Concussion in Children and Adolescents
Halstead, M. E., Walter, K. D., & The Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2005 · Cited by 628
The Role of Concussion History and Gender in Recovery from Soccer-Related Concussion
Chiang Colvin, A., Mullen, J., Lovell, M. R., Vereeke West, R., Collins, M. W., & Groh, M. (2009) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546509332497 · Cited by 333
Self-citationThe value added of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion
Van Kampen, D. A., Lovell, M. R., Pardini, J. E., Collins, M. W., & Fu, F. H. (2006) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546506288677 · Cited by 331
Self-citationCovassin, T., Swanik, C. B., Sachs, M., Kendrick, Z., Schatz, P., Zillmer, E., & Kaminaris, C. (2006) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2006.029496 · Cited by 260
Self-citationSport-Related Concussion in Children and Adolescents
Halstead, M. E., Walter, K. D., Moffatt, K., COUNCIL ON SPORTS MEDICINE AND FITNESS, LaBella, C. R., Brooks, M. A., Canty, G., Diamond, A. B., Hennrikus, W., Logan, K., et al. (2018) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2018-3074 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- SCHATZ, P., PARDINI, J., LOVELL, M., COLLINS, M., & PODELL, K.
- Venue
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-99
- ISSN
- 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153042227
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.