The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating elements of executive functioning as predictors of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs)
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Executive functioning has been repeatedly linked to the integrity of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). The present study examined the association of multiple executive functioning elements (i.e., working memory, generation, inhibition, planning, and sequencing) to IADLs among an older adult cohort at risk for future cognitive and functional decline. METHODS: Seventy-two participants with prevalent but stable cardiovascular disease completed a neuropsychological protocol assessing multiple elements of executive functioning, including COWA, PASAT, DKEFS Color-Word Interference Test, DKEFS Trail-Making Test, DKEFS Tower Test, and Ruff Figural Fluency Test. Reliable informants completed a measure of IADLs. RESULTS: Stepwise logistic regression selected a model involving a single significant predictor, a measure of inhibition (i.e., DKEFS Color-Word Interference Test), which had a significant regression coefficient. Subsequent correlation analyses confirmed an association between the inhibition measure and multiple IADL items. Inter-item comparisons among the IADLs revealed significant differences, such that telephone use and laundry were significantly more intact than most other IADLs while shopping and housekeeping were most compromised. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that inhibition, also known as susceptibility to interference, is most strongly related to IADL impairment among patients at risk for future cognitive and functional decline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“although our measure of executive functioning (DKEFS Inhibition) is commonly used to measure this NP domain,22,48”
From Neuropsychological Functioning and Treatment Outcomes in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain. (2018) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939 · Cited by 27,915
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,012
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,852
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,007
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D. L., & Stadlan, E. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000400650.92875.cf · Cited by 9,882
Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.3.303 · Cited by 8,980
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jefferson, A. L., Barakat, L. P., Giovannetti, T., Paul, R. H., & Glosser, G. (in press-a). Object perception predicts IADL impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology.
- Jefferson, A. L., Cahn-Weiner, D. A., Boyle, P. A., Paul, R. H., Moser, D. J., Gordon, N., et al. (in press-b). Longitudinal changes in activities of daily living (ADLs) among patients with vascular dementia (VaD). International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Executive functions in Parkinson's disease: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
Kudlicka, A., Clare, L., & Hindle, J. V. (2011) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.23868 · Cited by 421
Gold, D. A. (2011) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2011.614598 · Cited by 405
Johnson, J. K., Lui, L.-Y., & Yaffe, K. (2007) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/62.10.1134 · Cited by 339
Vaughan, L., & Giovanello, K. S. (2010) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0017729 · Cited by 368
Type and Severity of Cognitive Decline in Older Adults after Noncardiac Surgery
Price, C. C., GARVAN, C. W., & Monk, T. G. (2008) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000296072.02527.18 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- JEFFERSON, A., PAUL, R., OZONOFF, A., & COHEN, R.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- JEFFERSON, A
- Venue
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 311-320
- ISSN
- 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2746400
- OpenAlex
- W1998561429
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k12hd043444-10)
- National Institute on Aging (AG017975, AG022773, AG013846, P30AG013846, R01AG017975, F32AG022773)
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH065857, MH065857)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12-HD043444, HD043444)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- executive function, instrumental activities of daily living, inhibition, working memory, planning, sequencing, older adults, cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, functional decline, Color-Word Interference Test, activities of daily living
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Problem Solving, Residence Characteristics, Risk, Sampling Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Logistic Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review