Cited by 2Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

Comparative Efficacy of Non-contrast vs. Contrast-enhanced CT Radiomics in Predicting Coronary Artery Plaques Among Patients with Low Agatston Scores

Open access
Liang, Jianhua, Lin, Congcong, Qi, Hongliang, Lin, Yongkai, Deng, Liwei, Wu, Jieyao, Yang, Chunyang, He, Zhiyuan +5 more·2025·Academic Radiology

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with a low Agatston score often present with clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease, despite having minimal calcium deposits. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of low-dose non-contrast cardiac CT with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) radiomics for predicting coronary artery plaques, using CCTA as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 459 patients with suspected coronary artery disease and a coronary artery calcium score < 100 Agatston units, who were treated between June 2021 and December 2023 at a tertiary hospital. Three predictive models for coronary artery plaques were developed: (1) a clinical factor model, (2) a hybrid model integrating clinical factors and CT PCAT radiomics, and (3) a hybrid model integrating clinical factors and CCTA PCAT radiomics. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve evaluations were performed to develop and validate predictive models. RESULTS: Both hybrid models showed significant correlations in the training set (r = 0.890, P < 0.001) and the validation set (r = 0.920, P < 0.001). The mean agreement in the training set is 0, with 3.42% (11/322) of the data points outside the 95% CI (-0.18-0.18, P < 0.001). The mean agreement in the validation set is -0.244, with 6.57% (9/137) of the data points outside the 95% CI (-0.443-0.045, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Non-contract CT PCAT radiomics showed comparable efficacy to CCTA PCAT radiomics in predicting coronary artery plaques among patients with low Agatston scores.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.063

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radiomics-based approaches sought to refine risk stratification by extracting higher-dimensional imaging features beyond the Agatston score, including plaque texture, spatial distribution, density characteristics and lesion morphology.

    “Radiomics-based approaches sought to further refine risk stratification by extracting higher-dimensional imaging features beyond the Agatston score, including plaque texture, spatial distribution, density characteristics and lesion morphology.252635–37”

    From Prognostication and clinical opportunities with AI for coronary artery calcium: a scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Extraction and Selection of the Radiomic Features section reports texture-related, first-order and shape features, and the Discussion says radiomics depicts the texture and spatial relationships of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT). The study uses those PCAT features to predict plaques in patients with low calcium scores; it does not describe extracting plaque texture or lesion morphology as radiomic features. Plaque density is used separately to classify plaques. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, J., Lin, C., Qi, H., Lin, Y., Deng, L., Wu, J., Yang, C., He, Z., Li, J., Li, H., Hu, D., Chen, H., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
  • Southern Medical University (CN)
  • Nanfang Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Yuanzhang
Venue
Academic Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-03
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
1344-1352
ISSN
1076-6332 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405561270
Cited by
2
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Radiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Keywords
coronary plaque, pericoronary adipose tissue, radiomics, non-contrast cardiac CT, coronary CT angiography, coronary artery disease
MeSH terms
Computed Tomography Angiography, Radiomics, Adipose Tissue, Aged, Contrast Media, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Coronary Angiography, Plaque, Atherosclerotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review