Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and DiagnosticsVacuum and Plasma ArcsParticle accelerators and beam dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Equivalent two-dimensional numerical simulation of an ECR neutralizer

Abstract

Abstract The electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) neutralizer is a component of the 10-cm electron cyclotron resonance ion thruster (ECRIT) and its performance has a great effect on the overall performance of the thruster. To clarify the mechanisms of electron extraction of the ECR neutralizer, a particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision (PIC/MCC) solver was developed to simulate the plasma in the ECR neutralizer. This paper equivalently simplified the three-dimensional model of the ECR neutralizer into a two-dimensional axisymmetric one according to experimental results and the circumferential electric drift of charged particles. Hence, a two-dimensional three-velocity component full-particle calculation model was used in the solver. Through analyzing ECR heating mechanism, the validity and accuracy of the equivalent ring antenna were discussed. The distribution of plasma parameters and extracted electron current were obtained by tracking the motion of electrons and singly charged xenon ions, simulating the elasticity, excitation, ionization and Coulomb collisions. The results showed that the density of neutral particles can be adjusted to coincide simulation current with experiment. It was also found that due to the magnetic field gradient, plasma will migrate to the magnetic well, where the ion was in dominant position to form a potential well and hinder the extraction of electron.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.07.018

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fu, Y., Yang, J., Jin, Y., Xia, X., & Meng, H.
Affiliations
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Juan
Venue
Acta Astronautica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
164
Pages
387-392
ISSN
0094-5765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969934437
Cited by
9
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Astronautica (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11875222)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
Keywords
electron extraction, axisymmetric two-dimensional model, plasma parameter distribution, Coulomb collisions, magnetic field gradient, potential well

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.