Cited by 8Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processesMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsPlanetary Science and Exploration

Characterization of metal products from the molten salt electrolysis of lunar highland regolith simulants

Open access
Schild, Timon, Lomax, Bethany A., Conti, Melchiorre, Aridon, Gwenaelle, Harries, Dennis, Hadler, Kathryn·2025·Acta Astronautica

Abstract

The FFC (Fray-Farthing-Chen) molten salt electrolysis process is one of the proposed technologies for oxygen and metal extraction from lunar regolith. Previous work demonstrated its capacity to extract up to 96 % of the oxygen present in mare type regolith simulant without requiring regolith melting. The FFC process also allows direct recovery of the reduced regolith, which has been shown to comprise particles and agglomerates that are mostly metallic. Here, we present the first quantitative analysis of those metallic products. Molten salt electrolysis of LHS-1 highland regolith simulant was carried out and the reduced simulant products were separated into size fractions. Residual oxygen content of the material was determined by inert gas fusion. Bulk composition, local phase compositions and particle morphology were assessed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDX). The compositional data was analysed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and agglomerative clustering algorithms, to assess the interactions between the metallic elements in presence and to identify the main phases formed. Results were compared with the electrolysis of the major mineral component of highland regolith, anorthosite. The electrolysis was shown to extract 97–99 % of the oxygen present in the simulant feedstock, with an increased current efficiency for the anorthosite samples. Analysis of the reduced simulants showed a complex and heterogeneous mix of a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.02.021

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schild, T., Lomax, B. A., Conti, M., Aridon, G., Harries, D., & Hadler, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
  • European Space Agency (FR)
  • Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU)
Corresponding author
Schild, Timon
Venue
Acta Astronautica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-07
Volume
232
Pages
1-13
ISSN
0094-5765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407667747
Cited by
8
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Acta Astronautica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Airbus Defence and Space
  • European Space Agency (ESA-CIP-PSE-PA-dp-LE-2022-00219)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
molten salt electrolysis, oxygen extraction, metal recovery, alloys, anorthosite, current efficiency, phase composition, particle morphology, lunar in-situ resource utilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review