3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: From bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy.
Abstract
Toward the aim of personalized treatment, three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in bone tissue engineering owing to its advantage of a fast, precise, and controllable fabrication process. Conventional bioceramic scaffolds are mainly used for bone tissue engineering; however, there has been a significant change in the application of bioceramic scaffolds during the past several years. Therefore, this review focuses on 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with different compositions and hierarchical structures (macro, micro, and nano scales), and their effects on the mechanical, degradation, permeability, and biological properties. Further, this review highlights 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds for applications extending from bone tissue regeneration to bone tumor therapy. This review emphasizes recent developments in functional 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with the ability to be used for both tumor therapy and bone tissue regeneration. Considering the challenges in bone tumor therapy, these functional bioceramic scaffolds have a great potential in repairing bone defects induced by surgery and kill the possibly residual tumor cells to achieve bone tumor therapy. Finally, a brief perspective regarding future directions in this field was also provided. The review not only gives a summary of the research developments in bioceramic science but also offers a new therapy strategy by extending multifunctions of traditional biomaterials toward a specific disease. Statement of significance This review outlines the development tendency of 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds for applications ranging from bone tissue regeneration to bone tumor therapy. Conventional bioceramic scaffolds are mainly used for bone tissue engineering; however, there has been a significant change in the application of bioceramic scaffolds during the past several years. Therefore, this review focuses on 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with different compositions and hierarchical structures (macro, micro, and nano scales), and their effects on the mechanical, degradation, permeability, and biological properties. Further, this review highlights 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds for applications extending from bone tissue regeneration to bone tumor therapy. This review emphasizes recent developments in the functional 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with the ability to be used for both bone tumor therapy and bone tissue regeneration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
3D printing technologies can accurately and quickly fabricate scaffolds with precise geometry and high pore connectivity, similar to native tissues.
“it can accurately and quickly fabricate scaffolds with precise geometry and high pore connectivity, similar to native tissues [13][14][15][16][17]”
From A strategy to tailor the mechanical and degradation properties of PCL-PEG-PCL based copolymers for biomedical application (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology
Clarke, B. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.04151206 · Cited by 2,192 · see citing works
Unraveling of Advances in 3D-Printed Polymer-Based Bone Scaffolds
Xu, Y., Zhang, F., Zhai, W., Cheng, S., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14030566 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery
Janmohammadi, M., Nazemi, Z., Salehi, A. O. M., Seyfoori, A., John, J. V., Nourbakhsh, M. S., & Akbari, M. (2023) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.018 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Research Progress of Shape Memory Polymer and 4D Printing in Biomedical Application
Zhao, W., Yue, C., Liu, L., Liu, Y., & Leng, J. (2023) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202201975 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Design, printing, and engineering of regenerative biomaterials for personalized bone healthcare
Jia, Z., Xu, X., Zhu, D., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101072 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Current status and prospects of metal-organic frameworks for bone therapy and bone repair
Li, M., Yin, S., Lin, M., Chen, X., Pan, Y., Peng, Y., Sun, J., Kumar, A., & Liu, J. (2022) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d2tb00742h · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Khaled Wassif, R., Daihom, B. A., & Maniruzzaman, M. (2024) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124898 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Liu, Y.-Y., Blázquez, J. P. F., Yin, G.-Z., Wang, D.-Y., Llorca, J., & Echeverry-Rendón, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.15503 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ma, H., Feng, C., Chang, J., & Wu, C.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Chengtie
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 37-59
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888878293
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 45
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Biomaterialia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1105501)
- Natural Science Foundation of China (5171101275, 81771989, 81601612)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Keywords
- bone tissue engineering, bone regeneration, hierarchy, scaffold mechanical properties, scaffold degradation, scaffold permeability, bone defects, personalized treatment, multifunctional biomaterials
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Bone and Bones, Ceramics, Humans, Neoplasms, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Printing, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review