Cited by 156Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsBone fractures and treatments

Current status and prospects of metal-organic frameworks for bone therapy and bone repair

Li, Minmin, Yin, Shihai, Lin, Mingzi, Chen, Xuelin, Pan, Ying, Peng, Yanqiong, Sun, Jianbo, Kumar, Abhinav +1 more·2022·Journal of Materials Chemistry B

Abstract

With the development of society, traumatic bone defects caused by accidents, diseases and surgeries have become common, eventually resulting in an increase in bone defects. The treatment of bone defects is characterized by a long period of treatment, high cost and uncontrollable outcomes. Also, it results in complications such as infection and bone discontinuity. Hence, due to this situation, the physical, mental and financial aspects of the patient are severely affected. What's more, such outcomes pose a challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. As a result, bone therapy and bone repair have become a hot topic of interest. In repairing bone defects, materials other than autogenous bone are still unable to provide good biocompatibility, osteogenesis, osteoconductivity and osteoinduction properties at the same time. In addition, the scarcity of autologous bone sources has forced the search for new autologous bone replacement materials. Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are a new class of developed functional materials that have been widely used in the biomedical field during the recent years due to their porous nature, large specific surface area and diverse structures. With the progress in the investigation into bone treatment and repair, more and more investigators are using MOFs in bone therapy and bone repair. With these viewpoints, in the present perspective, the use of MOFs in bone therapy and bone repair has been summarized, and an insight into the future of MOFs in bone therapy and bone repair has been provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d2tb00742h

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Yin, S., Lin, M., Chen, X., Pan, Y., Peng, Y., Sun, J., Kumar, A., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong Medical College (CN)
  • University of Lucknow (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Sun, Jianbo
  • Kumar, Abhinav
  • Liu, Jianqiang
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
Published
2022
Volume
10
Issue
27
Pages
5105-5128
ISSN
  • 2050-750X (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7518
OpenAlex
W4283722004
Cited by
156
References
152
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 20
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Education of Guangdong Province (20202ZDZX2046 and 2021ZDZX2052)
  • Guangdong Medical Research Foundation (PF100-1-03)
  • Guangdong Province Higher Vocational Colleges and Schools Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (4SG22006G)
  • Guangzhou Science, Technology and Innovation Commission (pdjh2021a0218, pdjh2022a0217, pdjh2022b0225 and pdjh20220224)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
Keywords
metal-organic frameworks, bone regeneration, bone defects, bone substitutes, bone formation, osteoconductivity, osteoinduction, porous media, biocompatibility
MeSH terms
Metal-Organic Frameworks, Humans, Osteogenesis, Porosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review