Cited by 0Environmental Sustainability in BusinessConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorSustainable Supply Chain Management

From greenwashing to green trust: Understanding the consumer behavior in the fashion industry

Open access
Zhao, Jing, Zhou, Huaqing, Zhou, Min, Zheng, Cheng, Zhou, Lei, Yang, Fangrong·2026·Acta Psychologica

Abstract

The increasing environmental impact of the fashion industry has underscored the urgent need for sustainable business practices. However, consumer preferences remain heavily skewed toward fast fashion, posing a significant challenge to green consumption. This study examines the key determinants influencing Green Purchase Intention (GPI) within the fashion industry, emphasizing the mediating roles of Green Word of Mouth (GWOM) and Green Trust (GT). The research framework investigates the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Green Advertising (GA), and Greenwashing (GW) on GWOM and GT, which, in turn, shape Corporate Image (CI) and GPI. Employing a quantitative research design, data were collected from 300 online fashion consumers in China through a structured survey administered via the Sojump platform, using purposive sampling. The collected data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). First, the measurement model was assessed for reliability and validity through convergent and discriminant validity tests. Second, the structural model was evaluated to test the hypothesized relationships and predictive relevance. Findings indicate that CSR and GA positively influence GWOM and GT, whereas GW significantly reduces GT but does not impact GWOM. Furthermore, both GWOM and GT exhibit a strong positive effect on GPI and CI. These results highlight the need for fashion brands to adopt transparent green marketing strategies and implement authentic sustainability initiatives to build consumer trust and encourage positive word of mouth. By fostering greater credibility and corporate image, brands can strengthen long-term customer loyalty and drive sustainable consumption behavior in the fashion sector.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106850

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Alshura, 2016, Impact of green brand trust, green brand awareness, green brand image, and green perceived value on consumer’s intension to use green products: An empirical study of Jordanian consumers, International Journal of Advanced Research, 4, 1423
  2. Azjen, 1991, The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Humnan Decision Processees, 50, 179, 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chin, 1998, The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling, Modern Methods for Business Research, 295, 295
  4. Ghassani, 2022, The effect of greenwashing, green word of mouth, Green Trust and attitude towards green products on green purchase intention, Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5
  5. Godrati, 2024, Investigating the effect of environmental values on green product purchase intention with the mediating role of environmental concerns and the moderating role of green trust (case study: Green food consumers in Tabriz), Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 12, 157
  6. Hidayati, 2024, Re-examining the new“ greeneration” behaviors: How does the sequential mediation role of green word of mouth and green trust affect green purchase intention among generation Z?, Jurnal Manajemen Teori dan Terapan| Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 17
  7. Isac, 2024, Is greenwashing impacting on green brand trust and purchase intentions? Mediating role of environmental knowledge, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1
  8. Jaeger, 2020, Can you believe it? The effects of benefit type versus construal level on advertisement credibility and purchase intention for organic food, Journal of Cleaner Production, 257
  9. Park, 2022, The effect of corporate green marketing on consumer word of mouth intention, Industry Promotion Research, 7, 9
  10. Pham, 2025, The consequences of dishonesty—A mediation-moderation praxis of greenwashing, tourists’ green trust, and word-of-mouth: The role of connectedness to nature, Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 34, 639, 10.1111/beer.12670 · DOI
  11. Saleh, 2015, Customers’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Its impact on word-of-mouth and retention, Innovative Marketing, 11, 49
  12. Tho, 2020, Receiving positive word of mouth & spreading positive word of mouth: The role of trust, Journal of Business Administration and Education, 12
  13. Vanessa, 2024, Green advertising effectiveness: Brand image and green trust among generation Y and Z, Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 13, 5
  14. Wibowo, 2022, Effect of green marketing and word of mouth on Starbucks Indonesia consumer buying decisions with brand image as intervening variable, Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Sosial p-ISSN, 2301

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Zhao, J., Zhou, H., Zhou, M., Zheng, C., Zhou, L., & Yang, F.
Affiliations
  • Henan Agricultural University (CN)
  • Zhejiang Wanli University (CN)
  • Henan University of Engineering (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Fangrong
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-07
Volume
267
Pages
106850
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7162778405
Cited by
0
References
86
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project (242400411147)
  • International Science and Technology Cooperation Programme (252102521026)
  • Science and Technology Department of Henan Province (2025-ZDJH-773)
  • National Social Science Fund of China (23EH233)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
greenwashing, green trust, green purchase intention, green word-of-mouth, corporate social responsibility, green advertising, corporate image, sustainable consumption, fast fashion, fashion consumers, green marketing, consumer trust
MeSH terms
Adult, Advertising, China, Consumer Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Social Responsibility, Intention, Trust, Marketing, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review