Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socially prescribed perfectionism and graduate student burnout: Dual pathways via impostor feelings and generative AI anxiety, and via academic procrastination

Yang, Wendai, Du, Shuya·2026·Acta Psychologica

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107992

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Alareifi, 2026, Exploring the nexus of students’ attitudes toward AI in academic tasks and academic integrity awareness: A mixed-methods study, International Journal of Technology in Education, 9, 18, 10.46328/ijte.5792 · DOI
  2. Alia, 2025, An investigation of the association between stress levels, perfectionism, academic motivation, and resilience with academic burnout among nursing students: a cross-sectional study, Psychiatria, 22, 49, 10.5603/psych.107134 · doi:10.5603/psych.107134
  3. Ayyagari, 2011, Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications, MIS Quarterly, 35, 831, 10.2307/41409963 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Baidoo-Anu, 2023, Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning, Journal of AI, 7, 52, 10.61969/jai.1337500 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Belkina, 2025, Implementing generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: A systematic review of case studies, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8
  6. Bentler, 1987, Practical issues in structural modeling, Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78, 10.1177/0049124187016001004 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cabrera Vélez, 2026, Generative AI and the assurance of academic integrity in the context of south american higher education, Frontiers in Education, 11, 10.3389/feduc.2026.1796556 · DOI
  8. Chan, 2023, Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43, 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chang, 2020, Mediating effect of goal adjustment on the relationship between socially prescribed perfectionism and academic burnout, Psychology in the Schools, 57, 284, 10.1002/pits.22327 · DOI
  10. Clance, 1978, The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention., Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15, 241, 10.1037/h0086006 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cotton, 2024, Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61, 228, 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Crompton, 2023, Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22, 10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Demerouti, 2001, The job demands-resources model of burnout., Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499, 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · DOI · Paper page
  14. van Dis, 2023, ChatGPT: five priorities for research, Nature, 614, 224, 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dwivedi, 2023, Opinion paper: “so what if ChatGPT wrote it?” multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy, International Journal of Information Management, 71, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Evans, 2018, Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education, Nature Biotechnology, 36, 282, 10.1038/nbt.4089 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Festinger, 1954, A theory of social comparison processes, Human Relations, 7, 117, 10.1177/001872675400700202 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39, 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
  19. García-López, 2025, Ethical and regulatory challenges of generative AI in education: a systematic review, Frontiers in Education, 10
  20. Henseler, 2015, A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115, 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hewitt, 1991, Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456, 10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hill, 2016, Multidimensional perfectionism and burnout: A meta-analysis, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 269, 10.1177/1088868315596286 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hobfoll, 1989, Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress., American Psychologist, 44, 513, 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kasneci, 2023, ChatGPT for good? on opportunities and challenges of large language models for education, Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kim, 2015, The relationship between procrastination and academic performance: A meta-analysis, Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 26, 10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.038 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kofinas, 2025, The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context, British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 2522, 10.1111/bjet.13585 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Kusurkar, 2022, What stressors and energizers do PhD students in medicine identify for their work: A qualitative inquiry, Medical Teacher, 44, 559, 10.1080/0142159X.2021.2015308 · DOI
  28. Li, 2020, Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory, Technology in Society, 63, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Maslach, 2001, Job burnout, Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397, 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 · DOI · Paper page
  30. McDonald, 2025, Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines, Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3
  31. Memarian, 2023, ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations, Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1
  32. Revelle, 2009, Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on sijtsma, Psychometrika, 74, 145, 10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z · DOI · Paper page
  33. Rudolph, 2023, ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?, Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6, 342
  34. Salimi, 2025, Artificial intelligence anxiety: Psychometric properties and a mediation model, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41, 12349, 10.1080/10447318.2025.2457183 · DOI
  35. Sandi, 2026, Psychological correlates of sleep quality in nursing students: the roles of academic stress, perfectionism, coping, and resilience, Psychiatria, 23, 10.5603/psych.111466 · doi:10.5603/psych.111466
  36. Schaufeli, 2002, Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464, 10.1177/0022022102033005003 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Steel, 2007, The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure., Psychological Bulletin, 133, 65, 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Sverdlik, 2020, Not just a phase: Exploring the role of program stage on well-being and motivation in doctoral students, Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 26, 97, 10.1177/1477971419842887 · DOI
  39. Tikkanen, 2021, Study engagement and burnout of the PhD candidates in medicine: A person-centered approach, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727746 · DOI
  40. Wang, 2022, Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: an initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior, Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 619, 10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Wolf, 2013, Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 913, 10.1177/0013164413495237 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Yan, 2024, Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review, British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 90, 10.1111/bjet.13370 · DOI · Paper page
  43. You, 2021, Relations among socially prescribed perfectionism, career stress, mental health, and mindfulness in korean college students, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 12248, 10.3390/ijerph182212248 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Yang, W., & Du, S.
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-10
Volume
270
Pages
107992
ISSN
0001-6918
Cited by
0
References
10
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socially prescribed perfectionism and graduate student burnout: Dual pathways via impostor feelings and generative AI anxiety, and via academic procrastination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107992
The paper
Yang, W., & Du, S. (2026). Socially prescribed perfectionism and graduate student burnout: Dual pathways via impostor feelings and generative AI anxiety, and via academic procrastination. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107992

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.