Cited by 17Endodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsDental materials and restorationsPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Techniques and materials used by general dentists during endodontic treatment procedures

Open access
Eleazer, Paul D., Gilbert, Gregg H., Funkhouser, Ellen, Reams, Gregg J., Law, Alan S., Benjamin, Paul L.·2016·The Journal of the American Dental Association

Abstract

Background Little is known about which materials and techniques general dentists (GDs) use during root canal procedures. The objectives were to: (1) quantify GD’s use of specific endodontic armamentarium; (2) quantify inappropriate use; and (3) ascertain if inappropriate use is associated with dentists’ practice characteristics. Methods GDs in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network reported in a questionnaire materials and techniques they use during root canal procedures. Results 1,490 (87%) of eligible GDs participated. Most (93%; n=1,383) used sodium hypochlorite to irrigate. The most commonly used sealers were zinc oxide-eugenol (43%) and resin (40%), followed by calcium hydroxide (26%). A majority (62%; n=920) used a compaction obturation technique; 36% (n=534) used a carrier-based method. Most (96%; n=1,423) used gutta percha as a filler; 5% used paste fillers. Few used irrigants (n=46), sealers (n=4), techniques (n=49) or fillers (n=10) that investigators classified as ‘inappropriate’. Conclusions GDs use a broad range of endodontic techniques and materials, often adapting to newer technologies as they become available. Few GDs use armamentarium that the investigators classified as inappropriate. Practical Implications GDs use many types of endodontic techniques and materials, but only a very small percentage is not appropriate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.05.021

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Regan JD Chapter 10, Root Canal System Obturation, page 183 Endodontics 3rd Stock C Walker R Gulabivala K Mosby Edinburgh 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eleazer, P. D., Gilbert, G. H., Funkhouser, E., Reams, G. J., Law, A. S., & Benjamin, P. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Permanente Dental Associates, P.C. (US)
  • HistoryMiami (US)
Corresponding author
Eleazer, Paul D.
Venue
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
147
Issue
1
Pages
19-27
ISSN
0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2175506178
Cited by
17
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
endodontic treatment, endodontic materials, endodontic techniques, general dentists, sodium hypochlorite irrigation, endodontic sealers, zinc oxide eugenol, calcium hydroxide, gutta-percha, irrigants, dental practice characteristics
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Dental Instruments, Dental Materials, Dental Pulp Diseases, Endodontics, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Practice Patterns, Dentists'

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review