Cited by 35Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Disparities in completion of substance abuse treatment among Latino subgroups in Los Angeles County, CA

Guerrero, Erick G., Cepeda, Alice, Duan, Lei, Kim, Tina·2012·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Rationale A growing body of research has revealed disparities with respect to drug use patterns within Latino subgroups. However, the extent to which these potential disparities enable different Latino subgroups to respond favorably to treatment is unclear. Methods This study analyzed a subset of multicross-sectional data (2006-2009) on Latinos collected from publicly funded facilities in Los Angeles County, CA (N=12,871). We used multilevel logistic regressions to examine individual and service-level factors associated with treatment completion among subgroups of first-time Latino treatment clients. Results Univariate analysis showed that Cubans and Puerto Ricans were less likely to complete treatment than Mexicans and other Latinos. Cubans and Puerto Ricans entered treatment at an older age and with higher formal education than Mexicans, yet they were more likely to report mental health issues and use of cocaine and heroin as primary drugs of choice respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age, having mental health issues, reporting high use of drugs at intake, and use of methamphetamines and marijuana were associated with decreased odds of completing treatment among all Latino subgroups. In contrast, age at first drug use, treatment duration, and referral monitoring by the criminal system increased the odds of completing treatment for all members. Conclusion These findings have implications for targeting interventions for members of different Latinos groups during t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.05.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has found high rates of co-occurring psychiatric disorders, particularly ADHD, among chronic stimulant users.

    “studies have shown high levels of co-occurring psychiatric disorders, especially ADHD, in the context of chronic use of stimulants.156,158”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guerrero, E. G., Cepeda, A., Duan, L., & Kim, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
Guerrero, Erick G.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
1162-1166
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082771130
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
Latino subgroups, ethnic disparities, Cuban Americans, Puerto Rican Americans, Mexican Americans, age at first drug use, psychiatric comorbidity, cocaine use, heroin use, methamphetamine use, cannabis use, criminal justice referral, Los Angeles County
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cuba, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Risk Factors, Los Angeles, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review