Cited by 168Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and AccessOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Disparities in completion of substance abuse treatment between and within racial and ethnic groups

Open access
Guerrero, Erick G., Marsh, Jeanne C., Duan, Lei, Oh, Christine, Perron, Brian, Lee, Benedict·2013·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate disparities in substance abuse treatment completion between and within racial and ethnic groups in publicly funded treatment in L os A ngeles C ounty, C alifornia. Data Source: The L os A ngeles C ounty P articipant R eporting S ystem with multicross‐sectional annual data (2006–2009) for adult participants (n = 16,637) who received treatment from publicly funded programs (n = 276) for the first time. Study Design: Retrospective analyses of county discharge and admission data. Hierarchical linear regressions models were used to test the hypotheses. Data Collection: Client data were collected during personal interviews at admission and discharge for most participants. Principal Findings: A frican A mericans and L atinos reported lower odds of completing treatment compared with W hites. Within‐group analysis revealed significant heterogeneity within racial and ethnic groups, highlighting primary drug problem, days of drug use before admission, and homelessness as significant factors affecting treatment completion. Service factors, such as referral by the criminal justice system, enabled completion among L atinos and W hites only. Conclusions: These findings have implications for reducing health disparities among members of racial and ethnic minorities by identifying individual and service factors associated with treatment adherence, particularly for first‐time clients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-6773.12031

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous reviews have identified various individual, intervention, and organizational level factors affecting the relationship between psychological treatments and anxiety or substance use outcomes.

    “Previous reviews have identified various individual (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender), intervention (e.g., loss to follow-up, length of treatment), and organizational level factors (e.g., inpatient versus outpatient setting) affecting the relationship between psychological treatments and anxiety or substance use outcomes.(NIDA, 2020; Committee on Developing Evidence-Based Standards for Psychosocial”

    From A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for persons with comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders (2024) · cites this paper as Guerrero et al., 2013

    The Discussion (p. 1460) says individual, service, and system factors played a role in substance-abuse treatment completion across racial and ethnic groups. The source is an original study of outpatient treatment completion, not a review of psychological treatments, and it does not establish effects on anxiety or substance-use outcomes or compare inpatient with outpatient settings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Longabaugh, R.. 1991. "Monitoring Treatment Outcomes." Alcohol Health & Research World 15 (3): 189-200.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guerrero, E. G., Marsh, J. C., Duan, L., Oh, C., Perron, B., & Lee, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Guerrero, Erick G.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-27
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
1450-1467
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2126359575
Cited by
168
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
addiction treatment, treatment completion, racial and ethnic disparities, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, homelessness, criminal justice referral, Los Angeles County, health disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Retrospective Studies, Los Angeles, Linear Models, Logistic Models, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Substance-Related Disorders, White People, Racial Groups, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review