Cited by 27Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The relationship between electronic goal reminders and subsequent drug use and treatment initiation in a criminal justice setting

Open access
Spohr, Stephanie A., Taxman, Faye S., Walters, Scott T.·2015·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Introduction Opportunities to influence behavior through the use of electronic reminders has not been examined in a criminal justice population. The purpose of this study was to assess probationer preferences for short-term goals from a web-based program and evaluate the role of voluntary electronic reminders (e.g., text messaging, email) in achieving early treatment and probation tasks. Methods We used data from drug-involved offenders (n=76) participating in a clinical trial of a 2-session motivational computer program. As part of the program, participants could choose to receive text or email reminders about their probation and treatment goals for the next month. Poisson regression models were utilized to evaluate goal and reminder selection in relation to the days of substance use and treatment attendance at two-month follow-up. Results The most common goals were related to probation and treatment tasks, relationships, and cognitive reappraisals. Forty-five percent of probationers elected to receive electronic goal reminders at Session 1 with a slight increase at Session two (49%). Probationers who opted to receive electronic goal reminders at Session one selected significantly more goals on average (M=4.4, SD=2.1) than probationers who did not want reminders (M=3.4, SD=1.8), (t=2.41, p=.019). Reminder selection and total number of goals selected predicted days of substance use and treatment attendance at a two-month follow-up. Probationers who opted not to receive electronic reminders and those who only chose to receive reminders at one visit had more days of substance use compared to those who chose to receive reminders at both visits, 1.66 and 2.31 times respectively. Probationers who chose not to receive electronic reminders attended 56% fewer days of treatment compared to those who chose to receive reminders at both visits. Conclusions People's choice of short-term goals and reminders can provide advance notification of the likelihood of substance use and treatment initiation. Probation systems might use such information to triage at-risk probationers to a higher level of service, before problems have emerged.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.005

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Buhi ER Trudnak TE Martinasek MP Oberne AB Fuhrmann HJ McDermott RJ Mobile phone-based behavioural interventions for health: A systematic review Health Education Journal 2012 72 5 564 583
  2. DeLisi M Vaughn MG Foundation for a temperament-based theory of antisocial behavior and criminal justice system invovlement Journal of Criminal Justice 2014 42 1 10 25
  3. Fogg BJ Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do 2003 San Francisco, CA Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
  4. Taxman FS Cropsey KL Young DW Wexler H Screening, assessment, and referral practices in adult correctional settings: A national perspective Criminal Justice and Behavior 2007b 34 9 1216 1234 18458758 PMC2367319
  5. Taxman FS Walters ST Sloas LB Lerch J Rodriguez M Counselor vs. computer: a randomized controlled trial protocol comparing motivational tools to improve probationer treatment initiation and reduce substance use Contemporary Clinical Trials (in press). PMC4522391 26009023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spohr, S. A., Taxman, F. S., & Walters, S. T.
Affiliations
  • University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Spohr, Stephanie A.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
51
Pages
51-56
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W861647597
Cited by
27
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA029010-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
text messaging, email reminders, drug-involved offenders, probationers, substance use, treatment initiation, short-term goals, criminal justice
MeSH terms
Adult, Criminal Law, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Goals, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Substance-Related Disorders, Electronic Mail, Cell Phone, Young Adult, Criminals, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review