The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites
Open accessAbstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is a 3D printing technique which allows layer-by-layer build-up of a part by the deposition of thermoplastic material through a nozzle. The technique allows for complex shapes to be made with a degree of design freedom unachievable with traditional manufacturing methods. However, the mechanical properties of the thermoplastic materials used are low compared to common engineering materials. In this work, composite 3D printing feedstocks for FFF are investigated, wherein carbon fibres are embedded into a thermoplastic matrix to increase strength and stiffness. First, the key processing parameters for FFF are reviewed, showing how fibres alter the printing dynamics by changing the viscosity and the thermal profile of the printed material. The state-of-the-art in composite 3D printing is presented, showing a distinction between short fibre feedstocks versus continuous fibre feedstocks. An experimental study was performed to benchmark these two methods. It is found that printing of continuous carbon fibres using the MarkOne printer gives significant increases in performance over unreinforced thermoplastics, with mechanical properties in the same order of magnitude of typical unidirectional epoxy matrix composites. The method, however, is limited in design freedom as the brittle continuous carbon fibres cannot be deposited freely through small steering radii and sharp angles. Filaments with embedded short carbon microfibres (∼100 μm) show better print capabilities and are suitable for use with standard printing methods, but only offer a slight increase in mechanical properties over the pure thermoplastic properties. It is hypothesized that increasing the fibre length in short fibre filament is expected to lead to increased mechanical properties, potentially approaching those of continuous fibre composites, whilst keeping the high degree of design freedom of the FFF process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kabir, S. M. F., Mathur, K., & Seyam, A.-F. M. (2020) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 · Cited by 678
Daminabo, S. C., Goel, S., Grammatikos, S. A., Nezhad, H. Y., & Thakur, V. K. (2020) · Materials Today Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100248 · Cited by 567
Fused filament fabrication of polymer materials: A review of interlayer bond
Gao, X., Qi, S., Kuang, X., Su, Y., Li, J., & Wang, D. (2021) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101658 · Cited by 418
Al-Maharma, A. Y., Patil, S. P., & Markert, B. (2020) · Materials Research Express · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d · Cited by 404
Various FDM Mechanisms Used in the Fabrication of Continuous-Fiber Reinforced Composites: A Review
Karimi, A., Rahmatabadi, D., & Baghani, M. (2024) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym16060831 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Blok, L. G., Longana, M. L., Yu, H., & Woods, B. K. S.
- Venue
- Additive Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 176-186
- ISSN
- 2214-7810 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-8604
- OpenAlex
- W2800333761
- Cited by
- 866
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039
- The paper
- Blok, L. G., Longana, M. L., Yu, H., & Woods, B. K. S. (2018). An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.