The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoparticles for detection and diagnosis
Open accessAbstract
Nanoparticle-based platforms for identification of chemical and biological agents offer substantial benefits to biomedical and environmental science. These platforms benefit from the availability of a wide variety of core materials as well as the unique physical and chemical properties of these nanoscale materials. This review surveys some of the emerging approaches in the field of nanoparticle based detection systems, highlighting the nanoparticle based screening methods for metal ions, proteins, nucleic acids, and biologically relevant small molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanostructures in Biodiagnostics
Rosi, N. L., & Mirkin, C. A. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030067f · Cited by 4,603
Zhang, J., Song, S., Zhang, L., Wang, L., Wu, H., Pan, D., & Fan, C. (2006) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja061521a · Cited by 424
Metadata
- Authors
- Agasti, S. S., Rana, S., Park, M.-H., Kim, C. K., You, C.-C., & Rotello, V. M.
- Venue
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 316-328
- ISSN
- 0169-409X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104859976
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoparticles for detection and diagnosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.004
- The paper
- Agasti, S. S., Rana, S., Park, M.-H., Kim, C. K., You, C.-C., & Rotello, V. M. (2010). Nanoparticles for detection and diagnosis. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
