Cited by 469Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsSilk-based biomaterials and applications

ECM and ECM-like materials — Biomaterials for applications in regenerative medicine and cancer therapy

Open access
Hinderer, Svenja, Layland, Shannon Lee, Schenke-Layland, Katja·2016·Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Abstract

Regenerative strategies such as stem cell-based therapies and tissue engineering applications are being developed with the aim to replace, remodel, regenerate or support damaged tissues and organs. In addition to careful cell type selection, the design of appropriate three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds is essential for the generation of bio-inspired replacement tissues. Such scaffolds are usually made of degradable or non-degradable biomaterials and can serve as cell or drug carriers. The development of more effective and efficient drug carrier systems is also highly relevant for novel cancer treatment strategies. In this review, we provide a summary of current approaches that employ ECM and ECM-like materials, or ECM-synthetic polymer hybrids, as biomaterials in the field of regenerative medicine. We further discuss the utilization of such materials for cell and drug delivery, and highlight strategies for their use as vehicles for cancer therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.019

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinderer, S., Layland, S. L., & Schenke-Layland, K.
Affiliations
Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology (DE)
Venue
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
97
Pages
260-269
ISSN
0169-409X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2181778634
Cited by
469
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 13
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
  • Eberhard Karls University Tübingen
  • Fraunhofer IGB Stuttgart
  • Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts of Baden-Württemberg (33-729.55-3/214, SI-BW 01222-91)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHE 701/7-1)
  • European Union (604531 AMCARE, FP7-NMP-2013-SME-7)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
Keywords
extracellular matrix, biomaterials, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, 3D scaffolds, stem cell therapy, cell delivery, drug delivery, cancer therapy, drug carriers
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Neoplasms, Drug Delivery Systems, Tissue Engineering, Regenerative Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review