CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 114Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychosocial Factors Impacting YouthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Best friend attachment versus peer attachment in the prediction of adolescent psychological adjustment

Wilkinson, Ross B.·2010·Journal of Adolescence
DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined the utility of the newly developed Adolescent Friendship Attachment Scale (AFAS) for the prediction of adolescent psychological health and school attitude. High school students (266 males, 229 females) were recruited from private and public schools in the Australian Capital Territory with ages of participants ranging from 13 to 19 years. Self-report measures of depression, self-esteem, self-competence and school attitude were administered in addition to the AFAS and a short-form of the Inventory of Parental and Peer Attachment (IPPA). Regression analyses revealed that the AFAS Anxious and Avoidant scales added to the prediction of depression, self-esteem, self-competence, and school attitude beyond the contribution of the IPPA. It is concluded that the AFAS taps aspects of adolescent attachment relationships not assessed by the IPPA and provides a useful contribution to research and practice in the area of adolescent psycho-social adjustment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.013

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cohen J., 1975, Applied multiple regression
  2. Hazan C., 1994, Attachment processors in adulthood. Advances in personal relationships, 151
  3. Wilkinson R. B., Friendships: Types, cultural variations, and psychological and social aspects
  4. Wilson J., 2007, Paper presented at the Combined 7th Annual Conference of the Australian Psychological Society's Psychology of Relationships Interest Group and International Association for Relationship Research Mini‐Conference

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 114

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wilkinson, R. B.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wilkinson, Ross B.
ORCID
Wilkinson, Ross B.
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-11
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
709-717
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
DOI
10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.013
OpenAlex
W1973525983
Cited by
114
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
peer attachment, adolescent adjustment, depression, self-esteem, self-competence, attitudes toward school, attachment relationships, high school students
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Object Attachment, Peer Group, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Social Adjustment, Social Identification, Reproducibility of Results, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review