Cited by 606Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Two-dimensional self-esteem: Theory and measurement

Tafarodi, R.W, Swann, W.B·2001·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00169-0

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tafarodi, R. W., & Swann, W. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Tafarodi, R.W
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
653-673
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063729746
Cited by
606
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
FWCI
17.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
global self-esteem, self-competence, self-liking, self-esteem measurement, scale development, measurement model comparison, convergent validity, discriminant validity, multitrait-multimethod, informant agreement, parents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review