Cited by 1,294Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPersonality Traits and Psychology

Attachment-related psychodynamics

Shaver, Phillip R., Mikulincer, Mario·2002·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

Because there has been relatively little communication and cross-fertilization between the two major lines of research on adult attachment, one based on coded narrative assessments of defensive processes, the other on simple self-reports of 'attachment style' in close relationships, we here explain and review recent work based on a combination of self-report and other kinds of method, including behavioral observations and unconscious priming techniques. The review indicates that considerable progress has been made in testing central hypotheses derived from attachment theory and in exploring unconscious, psychodynamic processes related to affect-regulation and attachment-system activation. The combination of self-report assessment of attachment style and experimental manipulation of other theoretically pertinent variables allows researchers to test causal hypotheses. We present a model of normative and individual-difference processes related to attachment and identify areas in which further research is needed and likely to be successful. One long-range goal is to create a more complete theory of personality built on attachment theory and other object relations theories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616730210154171

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adult attachment is best described by two dimensions, avoidance and anxiety.

    “Also, research suggests that adult attachment is best described by two dimensions, avoidance, and anxiety (Shaver and Mikulincer, 2002; Mikulincer and Shaver, 2007).”

    From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Shaver and Mikulincer, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2002-09
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
133-161
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W2044141867
Cited by
1,294
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 70
FWCI
26.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
adult attachment, attachment theory, attachment styles, psychodynamics, emotion regulation, unconscious processes, defensive processes, personality theory, object relations theory, individual differences, causal hypotheses
MeSH terms
Adult, Defense Mechanisms, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Psychological, Object Attachment, Personality, Psychoanalytic Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review