Cited by 200Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingYouth Development and Social SupportPsychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

Constructing positive futures: Modeling the relationship between adolescents’ hopeful future expectations and intentional self regulation in predicting positive youth development☆

Schmid, Kristina L., Phelps, Erin, Lerner, Richard M.·2011·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

Intentional self regulation and hopeful expectations for the future are theoretically-related constructs shown to lead to positive youth development (PYD). However, the nature of their relationship over time has not been tested. Therefore, this study explored the associations between hopeful future expectations and intentional self regulation in predicting positive developmental outcomes. Participants were in Grades 7, 8, and 9 of the 4-H Study of PYD (N = 1311), a longitudinal study involving U.S. adolescents. A cross-lagged panel analysis using Structural Equation Modeling assessed the relations among hopeful future expectations and intentional self regulation across time in predicting PYD. Results indicated that earlier hopeful expectations for the future may be influential for later intentional self-regulation abilities, although both constructs were strong predictors of PYD in middle adolescence. We discuss implications for research and practice of hopeful expectations in adolescents' constructions of their positive futures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.07.009

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motivational beliefs, goals, and identities influence and are influenced by the contexts in which young people learn and develop.

    “Motivational beliefs, goals, and identities influence and are influenced by the contexts in which young people learn and develop (N.Perry et al., 2006;Schmid et al., 2011).”
  • Hopeful expectations for the future influence how students process information and, in turn, regulate their behavior.

    “Along similar lines, hopeful expectations for the future influence how students process information and, in turn, regulate their behavior (Schmid, Phelps, & Lerner, 2011).”

    From Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context<sup>1</sup> (2019) · cites this paper as Schmid, Phelps, & Lerner, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmid, K. L., Phelps, E., & Lerner, R. M.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Schmid, Kristina L.
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-22
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1127-1135
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W1972969062
Cited by
200
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Keywords
intentional self-regulation, positive youth development, adolescents, middle adolescence, developmental trajectories
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Aspirations, Psychological, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, United States, Intention, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review