CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 339Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentHealth disparities and outcomesBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding loneliness during adolescence: Developmental changes that increase the risk of perceived social isolation

Laursen, Brett, Hartl, Amy C.·2013·Journal of Adolescence
DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.06.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Loneliness is typically defined in terms of feeling states. In this review, we take a somewhat different approach, describing loneliness in terms of perceived social isolation. Vulnerabilities to perceived social isolation differ across the lifespan. Unique properties of adolescence are identified that carry special risk for perceived social isolation. These include (but are not limited to) developmental changes in companions, developmental changes in autonomy and individuation, identity exploration, cognitive maturation, developmental changes in social perspective taking, and physical maturation. Scholars are encouraged to consider loneliness through the lens of perceived social isolation so as to better understand how the experience of physical isolation varies across adolescence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.06.003

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Collins W.A., 2000, Close relationships, 59
  3. Smetana J.G., 1996, Rochester symposium on developmental psychopathology. Adolescence: Opportunities and challenges, 1
  4. Weiss R.S., 1973, Loneliness: The experience of social and emotional isolation
  5. Weiss R.S., 1974, Doing unto others, 17
  6. Youniss J., 1985, Adolescents' relations with their mothers, fathers and peers

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 336

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Laursen, B., & Hartl, A. C.
Affiliations
Florida Atlantic University (US)
Corresponding author
Hartl, Amy C.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-15
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
1261-1268
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
DOI
10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.06.003
OpenAlex
W2083390412
Cited by
339
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD068421)
  • National Science Foundation (0909733)
  • U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • U.S. National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
loneliness, perceived social isolation, adolescence, developmental changes, identity exploration, cognitive maturation, social perspective taking, physical maturation, companionship, physical isolation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depression, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Risk Factors, Sleep Wake Disorders, Social Isolation, United States, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review