Cited by 22Assembly Line Balancing OptimizationScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsManufacturing Process and Optimization

A multi-population cooperative coevolution artificial bee colony algorithm for partial multi-robotic disassembly line balancing problem considering preventive maintenance scenarios

Guo, Jun, Li, Yang, Du, Baigang, Sun, Xiang, Wang, Kaipu·2024·Advanced Engineering Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aei.2024.102750

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, J., Li, Y., Du, B., Sun, X., & Wang, K.
Affiliations
Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Du, Baigang
Venue
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
62
Pages
102750
ISSN
1474-0346 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401411939
Cited by
22
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Engineering Informatics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council (201606955091)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52305552, 51705386)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Assembly Line Balancing Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Keywords
preventive maintenance, artificial bee colony algorithm, task allocation, cycle time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review